XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by date - August, 2002

• Re: Byzantine schism - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: Byzantine schism - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: Byzantine schism - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Simple easy to use Java XML parser and data type - From: Ricardo Zuasti <rzuasti@k...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• RE: Why is there no schema for RSS? - From: "Peter Drayton" <peter@r...>
• RE: Is W3C Losing the Plot? - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: Byzantine schism - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• RE: what parsers support xml schema - From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• Re: Byzantine schism - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: what parsers support xml schema - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: what parsers support xml schema - From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• Microsoft XML Diff and Patch 1.0 available - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: what parsers support xml schema - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: what parsers support xml schema - From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• RE: what parsers support xml schema - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: Is W3C Losing the Plot? - From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@p...>
• Re: Byzantine schism - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• RE: Is W3C Losing the Plot? - From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@p...>
• RE: Byzantine schism - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: Is W3C Losing the Plot? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: Byzantine schism - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: Byzantine schism - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Re: Byzantine schism - From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• RE: Byzantine schism - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: Is W3C Losing the Plot? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: xml schema - From: "Paul Brown" <prb@f...>
• RE: what parsers support xml schema - From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• Re: Byzantine schism - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Byzantine schism - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: what parsers support xml schema - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Is W3C Losing the Plot? - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Re: what parsers support xml schema - From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• RE: inheritance by restriction - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: what parsers support xml schema - From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@h...>
• RE: xml schema - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: inheritance by restriction - From: "Phil Fuhlman" <pfuhlman@D...>
• RE: xml schema - From: "Maciejewski, Thomas" <Thomas.Maciejewski@l...>
• RE: xml schema - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• inheritance by restriction - From: "Maciejewski, Thomas" <Thomas.Maciejewski@l...>
• Re: xml schema - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• RE: xml schema - From: "Maciejewski, Thomas" <Thomas.Maciejewski@l...>
• RE: what parsers support xml schema - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Wayne Steele" <xmlmaster@h...>
• what parsers support xml schema - From: "Maciejewski, Thomas" <Thomas.Maciejewski@l...>
• xml schema - From: "Maciejewski, Thomas" <Thomas.Maciejewski@l...>
• First TAG WD published - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: Why is there no schema for RSS? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@m...>
• Re: XLink WG new charter - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• RE: XLink and XForms - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• ADMINISTRIVIA: Wondering if I can post ... - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• RE: XLink and XForms - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• XLink WG new charter - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• XLink and XForms - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• [ANN] Pollo 0.3.4 XML editor released - From: Bruno Dumon <bruno@o...>
• Re: XML indexing/search engine - From: "Steve Muench" <Steve.Muench@o...>
• conversion of XML to DBF - From: Valeri.Kireitchik@S...
• RE: Why is there no schema for RSS? - From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@i...>
• RE: XML indexing/search engine - From: "Naren Chawla" <naren_chawla@a...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• RE: Why is there no schema for RSS? - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: Why is there no schema for RSS? - From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@p...>
• Why is there no schema for RSS? - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@p...>
• RE: Linking global context - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Used the Amazon XML toolkit? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: Linking global context - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
• RE: Linking global context - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Linking global context - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: Linking global context - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Linking global context - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: Linking global context - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Linking global context - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• RE: W3C XML Schema public home page updated: new tools - From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@p...>
• RE: W3C XML Schema public home page updated: new tools - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: Getting dropped off the mail list - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureofDOM - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: problem adding new encoding to perl XML::Parser - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• RE: problem adding new encoding to perl XML::Parser - From: "Daben Liu" <dliu@b...>
• Re: problem adding new encoding to perl XML::Parser - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• problem adding new encoding to perl XML::Parser - From: "Daben Liu" <dliu@b...>
• FW: Cover Pages Newsletter August 27, 2002 - From: "Karl F. Best" <karl.best@o...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@a...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Alternate for a SHOWMODALDIALOG - From: "Raghava Krishna (CTC)" <Raghava.Krishna@A...>
• RE: linking, 80/20 - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• Re: Getting dropped off the mail list - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• RE: Getting dropped off the mail list - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: Getting dropped off the mail list - From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>
• Getting dropped off the mail list - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• RE: linking, 80/20 - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• ASP XML help? - From: <dale@q...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Absolute and relative names - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Another Newby question - From: "Carlos Vicente" <carlos.vicente@m...>
• Re: IBM Spam? - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Re: Re: How to implement getElementById() with Xerces using XMLSchema? - From: "H.-Gerd Rosarius" <gerd.rosarius@b...>
• RE: IBM Spam? - From: "W. Hugh Chatfield I.S.P." <hchatfield@u...>
• Re: How to implement getElementById() with Xerces using XMLSchema? - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• How to implement getElementById() with Xerces using XML Schema? - From: "H.-Gerd Rosarius" <gerd.rosarius@b...>
• Re: Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• IBM Spam? - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• OT svg display in IE question, performance - From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• test post - please ignore - From: "John Evdemon" <jevdemon@a...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: Reality check needed .... - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• RE: XML parsers acceptance - From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@p...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: FW: Renamer-att (was: Can XLink be fixed?) - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• XML parsers acceptance - From: "Naren Koka" <NKoka@s...>
• IETF XML principles draft - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: Newby question - From: "Carlos Vicente" <carlos.vicente@m...>
• Re: Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• FW: Renamer-att (was: Can XLink be fixed?) - From: "Keith W. Boone" <keith@w...>
• RE: Architectural Forms revival? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Re: Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death) - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death) - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: Architectural Forms revival? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: Architectural Forms revival? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: Architectural Forms revival? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death) - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death) - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d ev] patterns vs. identifiers) - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: patterns vs. identifiers) - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureofDOM - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Re: How to read a DTD file? - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: Infoset chewing gum (was Re: linking, 80/20) - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• What is this IDs/pattern rot? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: Architectural Forms revival? - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: Renamer-att (was: Can XLink be fixed?) - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Renamer-att (was: Can XLink be fixed?) - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Keith W. Boone" <keith@w...>
• RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• Re: [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer? - From: "William F. Gilreath" <will@w...>
• Re: [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer? - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Re: XML indexing/search engine - From: "Steve Muench" <Steve.Muench@o...>
• Re: Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@h...>
• [ANN] XML and Web Services Connections (31 Oct- 2 Nov in Orlando) - From: "Ken North" <ken_north@c...>
• Re: Architectural Forms revival? - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: How to read a DTD file? - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• namespaces and entities: a thought experiment - From: adam souzis <adam@k...>
• Re: Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: XML indexing/search engine - From: Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@S...>
• Re: Architectural Forms revival? - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• RE: XML indexing/search engine - From: "Ranjeet Sonone" <ranjeet@i...>
• Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: Mark Feblowitz <mfeblowitz@f...>
• Re: XML indexing/search engine - From: "Steve Muench" <Steve.Muench@o...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• RE: linking, 80/20 - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• APEX (was Re: Architectural Forms revival?) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: Architectural Forms revival? - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• RE: Architectural Forms revival? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: RE: XML indexing/search engine - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Architectural Forms revival? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer? - From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
• Re: RE: XML indexing/search engine - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer? - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• XML schema/DTD for Yellow Pages - From: "Andi S. Giri" <asgiri@s...>
• Re: XML indexing/search engine - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer? - From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
• RE: XML indexing/search engine - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: XML indexing/search engine - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: XML indexing/search engine - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• xmlsoftware.com is back - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• Re: Hobbsian processes - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: Hobbsian processes - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ) - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: Hobbsian processes - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: Hobbsian processes - From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• RE: Hobbsian processes - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: Hobbsian processes - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Hobbsian processes - From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• RE: Hobbsian processes - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Newby question - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• RE: Hobbsian processes - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: Hobbsian processes - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• How to read a DTD file? - From: "ajay somani" <ajay.somani@n...>
• Re: Newby question - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Newby question - From: "Carlos Vicente" <carlos.vicente@m...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@m...>
• Re: Hobbsian processes - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
• RE: XML indexing/search engine - From: "leon" <leon@i...>
• Re: Hobbsian processes - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: Hobbsian processes - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Hobbsian processes - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: XML indexing/search engine - From: Dvir Ben-Aaron <ilug@n...>
• Re: How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ) - From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>
• Re: How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ) - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
• RE: Schema Sanity Check - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-step approachon defining object-orientednatureof DOM) - From: Ken Sall <kensall@c...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: Schema Sanity Check - From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
• RE: Schema Sanity Check - From: "Steven Livingstone" <s.livingstone@b...>
• RE: Schema Sanity Check - From: "Steven Livingstone" <s.livingstone@b...>
• RE: Schema Sanity Check - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: A multi-step - From: bob mcwhirter <bob@w...>
• Re: Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: A multi-step - From: Jack Park <jackpark@t...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Schema Sanity Check - From: "Steven Livingstone" <s.livingstone@b...>
• RE: More AI Reading - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: A multi-step - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• More AI Reading - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: A multi-stepapproach on defining object-oriented) - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Namespaces blur (A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM) - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented n - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented n - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented n - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• XHTML Modularization in RNG (was: Best Practice - Vanilla XML?) - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
• Re: Namespaces blur (A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM) - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Namespaces blur (A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM) - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Re: Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-stepapproach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM) - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• XML indexing/search engine - From: "Roth, Scott (ITD)" <Scott.Roth@s...>
• Re: ANN: XML Schema of measurement units - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• xml digital preservation - From: Freschi Marco <Marco.Freschi@c...>
• Re: ANN: XML Schema of measurement units - From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
• RE: ANN: XML Schema of measurement units - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperr