XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by date - August, 2002

• Re: Byzantine schism - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: Byzantine schism - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: Byzantine schism - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Simple easy to use Java XML parser and data type - From: Ricardo Zuasti <rzuasti@k...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• RE: Why is there no schema for RSS? - From: "Peter Drayton" <peter@r...>
• RE: Is W3C Losing the Plot? - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: Byzantine schism - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• RE: what parsers support xml schema - From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• Re: Byzantine schism - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: what parsers support xml schema - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: what parsers support xml schema - From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• Microsoft XML Diff and Patch 1.0 available - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: what parsers support xml schema - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: what parsers support xml schema - From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• RE: what parsers support xml schema - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: Is W3C Losing the Plot? - From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@p...>
• Re: Byzantine schism - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• RE: Is W3C Losing the Plot? - From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@p...>
• RE: Byzantine schism - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: Is W3C Losing the Plot? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: Byzantine schism - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: Byzantine schism - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Re: Byzantine schism - From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• RE: Byzantine schism - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: Is W3C Losing the Plot? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: xml schema - From: "Paul Brown" <prb@f...>
• RE: what parsers support xml schema - From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• Re: Byzantine schism - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Byzantine schism - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: what parsers support xml schema - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Is W3C Losing the Plot? - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Re: what parsers support xml schema - From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• RE: inheritance by restriction - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: what parsers support xml schema - From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@h...>
• RE: xml schema - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: inheritance by restriction - From: "Phil Fuhlman" <pfuhlman@D...>
• RE: xml schema - From: "Maciejewski, Thomas" <Thomas.Maciejewski@l...>
• RE: xml schema - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• inheritance by restriction - From: "Maciejewski, Thomas" <Thomas.Maciejewski@l...>
• Re: xml schema - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• RE: xml schema - From: "Maciejewski, Thomas" <Thomas.Maciejewski@l...>
• RE: what parsers support xml schema - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Wayne Steele" <xmlmaster@h...>
• what parsers support xml schema - From: "Maciejewski, Thomas" <Thomas.Maciejewski@l...>
• xml schema - From: "Maciejewski, Thomas" <Thomas.Maciejewski@l...>
• First TAG WD published - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: Why is there no schema for RSS? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@m...>
• Re: XLink WG new charter - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• RE: XLink and XForms - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• ADMINISTRIVIA: Wondering if I can post ... - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: XLink and XForms - From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• RE: XLink and XForms - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• XLink WG new charter - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• XLink and XForms - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• [ANN] Pollo 0.3.4 XML editor released - From: Bruno Dumon <bruno@o...>
• Re: XML indexing/search engine - From: "Steve Muench" <Steve.Muench@o...>
• conversion of XML to DBF - From: Valeri.Kireitchik@S...
• RE: Why is there no schema for RSS? - From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@i...>
• RE: XML indexing/search engine - From: "Naren Chawla" <naren_chawla@a...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• RE: Why is there no schema for RSS? - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: Why is there no schema for RSS? - From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@p...>
• Why is there no schema for RSS? - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@p...>
• RE: Linking global context - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Used the Amazon XML toolkit? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: Linking global context - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
• RE: Linking global context - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Linking global context - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: Linking global context - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Linking global context - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: Linking global context - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Linking global context - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• RE: W3C XML Schema public home page updated: new tools - From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@p...>
• RE: W3C XML Schema public home page updated: new tools - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: Getting dropped off the mail list - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureofDOM - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: problem adding new encoding to perl XML::Parser - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• RE: problem adding new encoding to perl XML::Parser - From: "Daben Liu" <dliu@b...>
• Re: problem adding new encoding to perl XML::Parser - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• problem adding new encoding to perl XML::Parser - From: "Daben Liu" <dliu@b...>
• FW: Cover Pages Newsletter August 27, 2002 - From: "Karl F. Best" <karl.best@o...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@a...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Alternate for a SHOWMODALDIALOG - From: "Raghava Krishna (CTC)" <Raghava.Krishna@A...>
• RE: linking, 80/20 - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• Re: Getting dropped off the mail list - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• RE: Getting dropped off the mail list - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: Getting dropped off the mail list - From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>
• Getting dropped off the mail list - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• RE: linking, 80/20 - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• ASP XML help? - From: <dale@q...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Absolute and relative names - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Another Newby question - From: "Carlos Vicente" <carlos.vicente@m...>
• Re: IBM Spam? - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Re: Re: How to implement getElementById() with Xerces using XMLSchema? - From: "H.-Gerd Rosarius" <gerd.rosarius@b...>
• RE: IBM Spam? - From: "W. Hugh Chatfield I.S.P." <hchatfield@u...>
• Re: How to implement getElementById() with Xerces using XMLSchema? - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• How to implement getElementById() with Xerces using XML Schema? - From: "H.-Gerd Rosarius" <gerd.rosarius@b...>
• Re: Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• IBM Spam? - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• OT svg display in IE question, performance - From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• test post - please ignore - From: "John Evdemon" <jevdemon@a...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: Reality check needed .... - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• RE: XML parsers acceptance - From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@p...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: FW: Renamer-att (was: Can XLink be fixed?) - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• XML parsers acceptance - From: "Naren Koka" <NKoka@s...>
• IETF XML principles draft - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: Newby question - From: "Carlos Vicente" <carlos.vicente@m...>
• Re: Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• FW: Renamer-att (was: Can XLink be fixed?) - From: "Keith W. Boone" <keith@w...>
• RE: Architectural Forms revival? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Re: Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death) - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death) - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: Architectural Forms revival? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: Architectural Forms revival? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: Architectural Forms revival? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death) - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death) - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d ev] patterns vs. identifiers) - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: patterns vs. identifiers) - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureofDOM - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Re: How to read a DTD file? - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: Infoset chewing gum (was Re: linking, 80/20) - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• What is this IDs/pattern rot? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: Architectural Forms revival? - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: Renamer-att (was: Can XLink be fixed?) - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Renamer-att (was: Can XLink be fixed?) - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Keith W. Boone" <keith@w...>
• RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• Re: [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer? - From: "William F. Gilreath" <will@w...>
• Re: [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer? - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Re: XML indexing/search engine - From: "Steve Muench" <Steve.Muench@o...>
• Re: Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@h...>
• [ANN] XML and Web Services Connections (31 Oct- 2 Nov in Orlando) - From: "Ken North" <ken_north@c...>
• Re: Architectural Forms revival? - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: How to read a DTD file? - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• namespaces and entities: a thought experiment - From: adam souzis <adam@k...>
• Re: Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: XML indexing/search engine - From: Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@S...>
• Re: Architectural Forms revival? - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• RE: XML indexing/search engine - From: "Ranjeet Sonone" <ranjeet@i...>
• Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: Mark Feblowitz <mfeblowitz@f...>
• Re: XML indexing/search engine - From: "Steve Muench" <Steve.Muench@o...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• RE: linking, 80/20 - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• APEX (was Re: Architectural Forms revival?) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: Architectural Forms revival? - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• RE: Architectural Forms revival? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: RE: XML indexing/search engine - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Architectural Forms revival? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer? - From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
• Re: RE: XML indexing/search engine - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer? - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• XML schema/DTD for Yellow Pages - From: "Andi S. Giri" <asgiri@s...>
• Re: XML indexing/search engine - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer? - From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
• RE: XML indexing/search engine - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: XML indexing/search engine - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: XML indexing/search engine - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• xmlsoftware.com is back - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• Re: Hobbsian processes - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: Hobbsian processes - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ) - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: Hobbsian processes - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: Hobbsian processes - From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• RE: Hobbsian processes - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: Hobbsian processes - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Hobbsian processes - From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• RE: Hobbsian processes - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Newby question - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• RE: Hobbsian processes - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: Hobbsian processes - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• How to read a DTD file? - From: "ajay somani" <ajay.somani@n...>
• Re: Newby question - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Newby question - From: "Carlos Vicente" <carlos.vicente@m...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@m...>
• Re: Hobbsian processes - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
• RE: XML indexing/search engine - From: "leon" <leon@i...>
• Re: Hobbsian processes - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: Hobbsian processes - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Hobbsian processes - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: XML indexing/search engine - From: Dvir Ben-Aaron <ilug@n...>
• Re: How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ) - From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>
• Re: How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ) - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
• RE: Schema Sanity Check - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-step approachon defining object-orientednatureof DOM) - From: Ken Sall <kensall@c...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: Schema Sanity Check - From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
• RE: Schema Sanity Check - From: "Steven Livingstone" <s.livingstone@b...>
• RE: Schema Sanity Check - From: "Steven Livingstone" <s.livingstone@b...>
• RE: Schema Sanity Check - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: A multi-step - From: bob mcwhirter <bob@w...>
• Re: Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: A multi-step - From: Jack Park <jackpark@t...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Schema Sanity Check - From: "Steven Livingstone" <s.livingstone@b...>
• RE: More AI Reading - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: A multi-step - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• More AI Reading - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: A multi-stepapproach on defining object-oriented) - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Namespaces blur (A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM) - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented n - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented n - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented n - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• XHTML Modularization in RNG (was: Best Practice - Vanilla XML?) - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
• Re: Namespaces blur (A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM) - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Namespaces blur (A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM) - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Re: Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-stepapproach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM) - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• XML indexing/search engine - From: "Roth, Scott (ITD)" <Scott.Roth@s...>
• Re: ANN: XML Schema of measurement units - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• xml digital preservation - From: Freschi Marco <Marco.Freschi@c...>
• Re: ANN: XML Schema of measurement units - From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
• RE: ANN: XML Schema of measurement units - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
• Namespaces blur (A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednature of DOM) - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM - From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>
• Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM) - From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>
• Re: namespace revise - From: Marcus Carr <mcarr@a...>
• Re: ANN: XML Schema of measurement units - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• XForms: New & Last WD - From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@m...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: Micah Dubinko <MDubinko@c...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Re: ANN: XML Schema of measurement units - From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
• RE: ANN: XML Schema of measurement units - From: "CHIUSANO, Joseph" <JCHIUSANO@l...>
• ANN: XML Schema of measurement units - From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• URIs and XML Vocabularies As Code Systems (WAS RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
• RE: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: namespace reprise - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: namespace reprise - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: namespace reprise - From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
• RE: patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• RE: namespace reprise - From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: namespace reprise - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• RE: patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• Re: namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• RE: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• RE: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM - From: "Keith W. Boone" <keith@w...>
• RE: namespace reprise - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
• RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: namespace reprise - From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: namespace reprise - From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@h...>
• RE: namespace reprise - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• Re: namespace reprise - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Re: namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Re: namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: namespace reprise - From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>
• Re: namespace reprise - From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>
• Re: namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• RE: namespace reprise - From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>
• Re: namespace reprise - From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>
• Re: namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• global markup (was Re: XHTML 2.0, death of XLink) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• RE: namespace reprise - From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: namespace reprise - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• RE: namespace reprise - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• RE: namespace reprise - From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>
• Re: namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
• RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• RE: namespace reprise - From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>
• Re: Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death) - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
• RE: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• RE: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• RE: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Re: namespace reprise - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• RE: Namespace declaration versus attribute - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• ERPANET workshop Urbino - From: Italian.Editor@e... <Italian.editor@e...>
• RE: namespace reprise - From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• Re: Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death) - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Re: namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: namespace reprise - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM - From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• RE: namespace reprise - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• Re: namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• RE: XSD <any> and namespaces - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• XSD <any> and namespaces - From: Daniel Prager <danielp@d...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM - From: Sam Hunting <shunting@e...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: namespace reprise - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: namespace reprise - From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: bob mcwhirter <bob@w...>
• A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: Margarita Isayeva <isayevam@y...>
• Searching a SinglNode - From: "Karl Stubsjoen" <karl@a...>
• Re: shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies) - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• RE: namespace reprise - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: namespace reprise - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: namespace reprise - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• namespace reprise - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death) - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• RE: Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• filemaker pro, xml and rtf documents - From: "David Nyberg, M.D." <nyberg@u...>
• Re: Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) - From: Jon Noring <noring@o...>
• Re: shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) - From: "Keith W. Boone" <keith@w...>
• Re: shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies) - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• Re: Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• RE: Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: RDFInterpretation of XML documents ) - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies) - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Re: ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• Re: Namespace declaration versus attribute - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: XML Tokenizer - a free, simple open-source XML Parser - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: Namespace declaration versus attribute - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Namespace declaration versus attribute - From: amyzing@t... (Amelia A Lewis)
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: patterns vs. - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: Namespace declaration versus attribute - From: Kian-Tat Lim <ktl@k...>
• xml corpus - disregard - From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• xml corpus - From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d ev] patterns vs. identifiers) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Namespace declaration versus attribute - From: amyzing@t... (Amelia A Lewis)
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: patterns vs. identifiers) - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: patterns vs. identifiers) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: patterns vs. identifiers) - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: amyzing@t... (Amelia A Lewis)
• RE: Infoset chewing gum (was Re: linking, 80/20) - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: patterns vs.identifiers) - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
• RE: linking, 80/20 - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: Is the XLink WG currently chartered or not? - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
• the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20] - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• Re: RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: Is the XLink WG currently chartered or not? - From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Is the XLink WG currently chartered or not? - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• RE: Newbie confusion with xml - From: "Mark Seaborne" <MSeaborne@o...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• RE: linking, 80/20 - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Mike Haarman <mhaarma@s...>
• XML Tokenizer - a free, simple open-source XML Parser - From: "William F. Gilreath" <will@w...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: Eddie Robertsson <erobertsson@a...>
• RE: Saving XML Docs on web - From: "Karl Stubsjoen" <karl@a...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• Re: Infoset chewing gum (was Re: linking, 80/20) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Re: Saving XML Docs on web - From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@h...>
• Re: Infoset chewing gum (was Re: linking, 80/20) - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• Saving XML Docs on web - From: "Karl Stubsjoen" <karl@a...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Do sheep dream of electric URLs? - From: Marcus Carr <mcarr@a...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
• RE: linking, 80/20 - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Infoset chewing gum (was Re: linking, 80/20) - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• RE: linking, 80/20 - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: linking, 80/20 - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: XLink olden days - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• RE: linking, 80/20 - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
• RE: linking, 80/20 - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• Re: CDATA section - From: Mike Brown <mike@s...>
• Re: Infoset chewing gum (was Re: linking, 80/20) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Infoset chewing gum (was Re: linking, 80/20) - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Infoset chewing gum (was Re: linking, 80/20) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: linking, 80/20 - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: XML-Schema Help - From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>
• patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Do sheep dream of electric URLs? - From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@y...>
• Re: Newbie confusion with xml - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@y...>
• Newbie confusion with xml - From: <dale@q...>
• CDATA section - From: Yu Ye Zhou <yuyezhou@y...>
• RE: XML, hypertext - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: WXS acronym?) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: Do sheep dream of electric URLs? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Just-In-Time-Trees (JITTs) - From: Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@e...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Re: XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear - From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• RE: XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear - From: "CHIUSANO, Joseph" <JCHIUSANO@l...>
• Re: XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear - From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: WXS acronym?) - From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• [ANN] <oXygen/> XML Editor 1.2.2 - From: "George Cristian Bina" <george@s...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: Eddie Robertsson <erobertsson@a...>
• RE: WXS acronym? - From: "Michael Leditschke" <mike@a...>
• Re: XLink olden days - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: WXS acronym?) - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: Acronym spaces, namespaces,and authority (was Re: - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: Eddie Robertsson <erobertsson@a...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: linking, 80/20 - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• RE: linking, 80/20 - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• RE: linking, 80/20 - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• RE: XML, hypertext - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• Re: XLink olden days - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: XLink olden days - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• RE: XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear - From: "CHIUSANO, Joseph" <JCHIUSANO@l...>
• RE: XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• RE: XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear - From: "CHIUSANO, Joseph" <JCHIUSANO@l...>
• XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear - From: "CHIUSANO, Joseph" <JCHIUSANO@l...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Re: Acronym spaces,namespaces,and authority (was Re: WXS acronym?) - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: WXS acronym? - From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>
• Re: Linking solutions - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: WXS acronym?) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Linking solutions - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: Acronym spaces, namespaces,and authority (was Re: WXS acronym?) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Re: Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: WXS acronym?) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Acronym spaces, namespaces,and authority (was Re: WXS acronym?) - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
• RE: WXS acronym? - From: "Michael Leditschke" <mike@a...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Henrik Motakef <henrik.motakef@w...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• RE: linking, 80/20 - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: Tearing the Hyperlink Problem Apart (was Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?) - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>
• Re: linking, 80/20 - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• linking, 80/20 - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Tearing the Hyperlink Problem Apart (was Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?) - From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>
• RE: RE: XQuery subset (was RE: WXS acronym?) - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• URI types and functionality (Re: Do sheep dream of electricURLs?) - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Re: Do sheep dream of electric URLs? - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: Do sheep dream of electric URLs? - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: Do sheep dream of electric URLs? - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: Do sheep dream of electric URLs? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: Do sheep dream of electric URLs? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: Do sheep dream of electric URLs? - From: Ian Graham <igraham@i...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Fwd: infoset data model - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Re: Do sheep dream of electric URLs? - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Do sheep dream of electric URLs? - From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@h...>
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>
• Announcement: new Grammar Test Pages for XQuery1.0 and XPath2.0 - From: Massimo Marchiori <massimo@w...>
• Re: P2P and URIs - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Re: P2P and URIs - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: WXS acronym? - From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• Announcement: New W3C specifications of XQuery and XPath2 - From: Massimo Marchiori <massimo@w...>
• Re: XML-Schema Help - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: XML-Schema Help - From: "Ranjeet Sonone" <ranjeet@i...>
• Re: XML-Schema Help - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: XML-Schema Help - From: "Ranjeet Sonone" <ranjeet@i...>
• RE: RE: XQuery subset (was RE: WXS acronym?) - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: XML, hypertext - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: RE: XQuery subset (was RE: WXS acronym?) - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Re: XML-Schema Help - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: XML-Schema Help - From: "Priscilla Walmsley" <priscilla@w...>
• RE: XML-Schema Help - From: Doug Rudder <drudder@d...>
• RE: XML-Schema Help - From: "Ranjeet Sonone" <ranjeet@i...>
• RE: XML, hypertext - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: XML-Schema Help - From: "Priscilla Walmsley" <priscilla@w...>
• RE: XML-Schema Help - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: XML-Schema Help - From: "Dave Yancey" <dyancey1@h...>
• RE: XML-Schema Help - From: "Ranjeet Sonone" <ranjeet@i...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• XForms etc Terminology (Was: WXS acronym?) - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: Paul Spencer <paul@a...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• RE: XML, hypertext - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: XML, hypertext - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: XML, hypertext - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: Hypertext and complexity (was RE: XML, hypertext) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• RE: XML-Schema Help - From: "Dave Yancey" <dyancey1@h...>
• RE: XML, hypertext - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: XML, hypertext - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: XML, hypertext - From: Bob DuCharme <bobdc@s...>
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: XML-Schema Help - From: "Dave Yancey" <dyancey1@h...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@h...>
• RE: XML, hypertext - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: XML-Schema Help - From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
• RE: XML, hypertext - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: RE: XQuery subset (was RE: WXS acronym?) - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Re: XML-Schema Help - From: "Bryce K. Nielsen" <bryce@s...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: "Bryce K. Nielsen" <bryce@s...>
• RE: XML-Schema Help - From: "CHIUSANO, Joseph" <JCHIUSANO@l...>
• Re: RE: XQuery subset (was RE: WXS acronym?) - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• RE: XQuery subset (was RE: WXS acronym?) - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Re: XML-Schema Help - From: "Bryce K. Nielsen" <bryce@s...>
• RE: XML-Schema Help - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: XMLHTTP Posts and performance - From: "McNally, David" <David.McNally@m...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• XML-Schema Help - From: "Dave Yancey" <dyancey1@h...>
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• (Fwd) Re: WXS acronym? - From: "Matt Gushee" <mgushee@h...>
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• XQuery subset (was RE: WXS acronym?) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: XML, hypertext - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: WXS acronym? - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: XML, hypertext - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• RE: XML, hypertext - From: Jack Park <jackpark@t...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• RE: WXS acronym? - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: XML, hypertext - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: WXS acronym? - From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• WXS acronym? - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Re: XML, hypertext - From: Bob DuCharme <bobdc@s...>
• Hypertext and complexity (was RE: XML, hypertext) - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Bob DuCharme <bobdc@s...>
• RE: XML, hypertext - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• XML, hypertext - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Steven Livingstone" <s.livingstone@b...>
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: XLink 2.0 Requirements - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "J. David Eisenberg" <catcode@c...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• CSS processing (was Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "J. David Eisenberg" <catcode@c...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• Gah - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Shane McCarron <shane@a...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: XML Schema for large database - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: XML Schema for large database - From: Bill Riegel <BRiegel@l...>
• Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: XML Schema for large database - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: XML Schema for large database - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: XML is not being Validated against schema...? - From: "Steven Livingstone" <s.livingstone@b...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: XML is not being Validated against schema...? - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• XML is not being Validated against schema...? - From: "SISCO" <SISCO@l...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@y...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>
• RE: XML Schema for large database - From: "CHIUSANO, Joseph" <JCHIUSANO@l...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: mgushee@h...
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@m...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• XMLHTTP Posts and performance - From: "Karl Stubsjoen" <karl@a...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: file system or http - From: Kal Ahmed <kal@t...>
• XML Schema for large database - From: Bill Riegel <BRiegel@l...>
• XML 2002 announces keynotes and early registration discount..save over $300.00 now - From: "Elledge, Marion" <MElledge@i...>
• file system or http - From: "Falls, Travis D (CASD, IT)" <Travis.Falls@t...>
• Re: WSFL Question - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@m...>
• RE: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) - From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@b...>
• Re: WSFL Question - From: bob mcwhirter <bob@w...>
• WSFL Question - From: "CHIUSANO, Joseph" <JCHIUSANO@l...>
• Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• RE: Is XML Ubiquitous yet? (was Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?) - From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Wayne Steele" <xmlmaster@h...>
• RE: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@m...>
• RE: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Re: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Wayne Steele" <xmlmaster@h...>
• SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: Is XML Ubiquitous yet? (was Re: PushingSAX events out onto the Web?) - From: Bob Hutchison <hutch@x...>
• Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
• Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@y...>
• Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@y...>
• Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
• RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Is XML Ubiquitous yet? (was Re: Pushing SAX events out ontothe Web?) - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: Bob Hutchison <hutch@x...>
• RE: RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@i...>
• Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
• RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@i...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Java SAX Speed (Was: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?) - From: Jochen Wiedmann <joe@i...>
• TAG posts draft web architecture doc for review - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• CfP: Open Source implementation of JAXB - From: Jochen Wiedmann <joe@i...>
• RE: Mapping URLs to Qnames to Schema types - From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@b...>
• Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
• RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? - From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: Types (again) - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• RE: Types (again) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Formulae and Patterns (again) (Was: Types (again)) - From: Mike Haarman <mhaarma@s...>
• RE: Types (again) - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Can XLink be fixed? - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• XLink and XML specs (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death ofXLink and XPointer?) - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• RE: Transform XML and Stylesheets - From: "Karl Stubsjoen" <karl@a...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Transform XML and Stylesheets - From: "Karl Stubsjoen" <karl@a...>
• Re: W3C Schema profiling and risk analysis - From: Dare Obasanjo <kpako@y...>
• RE: W3C Schema profiling and risk analysis - From: "CHIUSANO, Joseph" <JCHIUSANO@l...>
• W3C Schema profiling and risk analysis - From: Bob DuCharme <bobdc@s...>
• Re: P2P and URIs - From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>
• Semantic Web Maintenance (WAS RE: P2P and URIs) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: P2P and URIs - From: Dare Obasanjo <kpako@y...>
• Re: P2P and URIs - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: Root Document Node - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: Comparable considered necessary - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: Root Document Node - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Root Document Node - From: "Karl Stubsjoen" <karl@e...>
• Re: P2P and URIs - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: SQL 2k or XML? - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@b...>
• Re: P2P and URIs - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Mapping URLs to Qnames to Schema types - From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@b...>
• Re: SQL 2k or XML? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: P2P and URIs - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• SQL 2k or XML? - From: "Falls, Travis D (CASD, IT)" <Travis.Falls@t...>
• Re: URIs == the Web was: Re: quarantining namespaces - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Formulae and Patterns (again) (Was: Types (again)) - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@m...>
• Types (again) - From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• RE: XLink 2.0 Requirements - From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@b...>
• Re: XLink 2.0 Requirements - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• RE: P2P and URIs - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• P2P and URIs - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: Comparable considered necessary - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: URIs == the Web was: Re: quarantining namespaces - From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>
• Re: quarantining namespaces - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: URIs == the Web was: Re: quarantining namespaces - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: XLink 2.0 Requirements - From: Micah Dubinko <MDubinko@c...>
• Re: RDDL and RDF and RSS - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RDDL and RDF and RSS - From: Doug Ransom <Doug.Ransom@p...>
• RE: quarantining namespaces - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• away for awhile - From: jborden@a...
• RE: Analogy (was RE: quarantining namespaces) - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• Re: URIs == the Web was: Re: quarantining namespaces - From: jborden@a...
• Re: URIs == the Web was: Re: quarantining namespaces - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: URIs == the Web was: Re: quarantining namespaces - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: URIs == the Web was: Re: quarantining namespaces - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Duality was: Re: quarantining namespaces - From: jborden@a...
• Re: URIs == the Web was: Re: quarantining namespaces - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• URIs == the Web was: Re: quarantining namespaces - From: jborden@a...
• RE: Analogy (was RE: quarantiningnamespaces) - From: "SISCO" <SISCO@l...>
• Re: Analogy (was RE: quarantining namespaces) - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: Analogy (was RE: quarantining namespaces) - From: "James Fuller" <james.fuller@o...>
• Re: Analogy (was RE: quarantining namespaces) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: Analogy (was RE: quarantining namespaces) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Analogy (was RE: quarantining namespaces) - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: quarantining namespaces - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: quarantining namespaces - From: "James Fuller" <james.fuller@o...>
• RE: quarantining namespaces - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: quarantining namespaces - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Re: quarantining namespaces - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Chris Croome <chris@w...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• RE: quarantining namespaces - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: quarantining namespaces - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Editor's Concrete Syntax (ECS) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: Comparable considered necessary - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: Comparable considered necessary - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: XLink olden days - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: Comparable considered necessary - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: quarantining namespaces - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: quarantining namespaces - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: quarantining namespaces - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: quarantining namespaces - From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• RE: quarantining namespaces - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• RE: quarantining namespaces - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: quarantining namespaces - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Comparable considered necessary - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: quarantining namespaces - From: jborden@a...
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Comparable considered necessary - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Re: XLink olden days - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Comparable considered necessary - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: Comparable considered necessary - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@b...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: quarantining namespaces - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: quarantining namespaces - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@b...>
• Re: XLink olden days - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Paul Brown" <prb@f...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Re: Comparable considered necessary - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Re: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Comparable considered necessary - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: XLink 2.0 Requirements - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Re: quarantining namespaces - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• RE: rng 2 xmi - From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@b...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@b...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• rng 2 xmi - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@b...>
• RE: how would one define credible linking? - From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• XLink 2.0 Requirements - From: Micah Dubinko <MDubinko@c...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@b...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: how would one define credible linking? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: XLink olden days - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• RE: Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Paul Brown" <prb@f...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: Complex or Simple content usage - From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Re: XML "needs" a credible linking specification? Discuss. - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Complex or Simple content usage - From: Danny Vint <dvint@m...>
• Re: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• how would one define credible linking? - From: "Devon Y." <vehementpetal@h...>
• Re: Comparable considered necessary - From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Re: XML "needs" a credible linking specification? Discuss. - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: XML "needs" a credible linking specification? Discuss. - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: how to se the transformed output... - From: sandr8 <sandreight@q...>
• Re: XLink olden days - From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Re: how to se the transformed output... - From: sandr8 <sandreight@q...>
• Re: Re: maps - From: Jkahlo1@a...
• RE: XML "needs" a credible linking specification? Discuss. - From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>
• XML "needs" a credible linking specification? Discuss. - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Re: XLink olden days - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• RE: Comparable considered necessary - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Re: how to se the transformed output... - From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
• Comparable considered necessary - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: XLink olden days - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: XLink olden days - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• how to se the transformed output... - From: sandr8 <sandreight@q...>
• Re: XLink olden days - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w...>
• quarantining namespaces - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: XLink olden days - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: XLink olden days - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: XLink olden days - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• RE: Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• XLink olden days - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: matching text with regexp in xpath - From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• RE: code challenge - From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: agreements vs. Hobbes - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: ADMINISTRIVIA: list server / archive problems? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: matching text with regexp in xpath - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Re: matching text with regexp in xpath - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Micah Dubinko <MDubinko@c...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Upload Carriage returns Form - From: "Karl Stubsjoen" <karl@e...>
• Re: FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002 - From: "Jim Keohane" <jimkeo@m...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Micah Dubinko <MDubinko@c...>
• actually - From: Dean James Greenwood <D.Greenwood@c...>
• writing DOM contents to a File or String? - From: Dean James Greenwood <D.Greenwood@c...>
• RE: RE: FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002 - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Re: RE: FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra,11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002 - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002 - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002 - From: Mike Haarman <mhaarma@s...>
• RE: Is it time for the 80/20 thread yet? - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• RE: W3C Standards and Vendor Support - From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>
• RE: FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002 - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002 - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• Re: Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Micah Dubinko <MDubinko@c...>
• XLink and Hobbes (was Re: agreements vs. Hobbes) - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• RE: XPointer architecture (Re: XPointer and XML Schema) - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: "Niklas Gustavsson" <niklas@p...>
• RE: code challenge - From: "Paul Brown" <prb@f...>
• W3C Standards and Vendor Support - From: "CHIUSANO, Joseph" <JCHIUSANO@l...>
• RE: Multidimensional XML - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• RE: Multidimensional XML - From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>
• RE: Multidimensional XML - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• About XSLT and the recent mail to me - From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• RE: Multidimensional XML - From: Kakade Mangesh <Mangesh.Kakade@s...>
• RE: Multidimensional XML - From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• RE: Multidimensional XML - From: "James Fuller" <james.fuller@o...>
• Multidimensional XML - From: Kakade Mangesh <Mangesh.Kakade@s...>
• RE: Iceberg development (was Re: maps) - From: "Mark Seaborne" <MSeaborne@o...>
• XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• RE: code challenge - From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>
• RE: code challenge - From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>
• FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002 - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Re: Is it time for the 80/20 thread yet? - From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
• Re: code challenge - From: Morten Primdahl <morten@c...>
• Re: IE6, XSL and The Web (was: RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains) - From: "George Cristian Bina" <george@s...>
• XML Core WG would appreciate test cases for XInclude - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Is it time for the 80/20 thread yet? - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• RE: code challenge - From: "Toivo \"Deutsch\" Lainevool" <tlainevool@n...>
• RE: code challenge - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: code challenge - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• code challenge - From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>
• Re: IE6, XSL and The Web (was: RE: What the .... ?Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains) - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• IE6, XSL and The Web (was: RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains) - From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@m...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@y...>
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@m...>
• =?utf-8?B?UkU6IFt4bWwtZGV2XSBtYXRjaGluZyB0ZXh0IHdpdGggcmVnZXhw?==?utf-8?B?IGluIHhwYXRo?= - From: =?utf-8?B?V2FubmhlZGVuLCBLbnV0?= <knut.wannheden@p...>
• RE: matching text with regexp in xpath - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• RE: agreements vs. Hobbes - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• process vs. "it is" - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• agreements vs. Hobbes - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Re: matching text with regexp in xpath - From: "Juan Estevan Madrigal" <juan_estevan_madrigal@h...>
• What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains - From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@m...>
• Re: ADMINISTRIVIA: list server / archive problems? - From: Jeffrey Lomas <jeff.lomas@o...>
• RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published - From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published - From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• RE: RE: Tree View + / - Lists with XSL - From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• RE: Iceberg development (was Re: maps) - From: "Mark Seaborne" <MSeaborne@o...>
• RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published - From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• RE: matching text with regexp in xpath - From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• RE: matching text with regexp in xpath - From: "James Fuller" <james.fuller@o...>
• matching text with regexp in xpath - From: "Wannheden, Knut" <knut.wannheden@p...>
• Re: another naieve question - valid characters for ID values - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Re: Overwhelmed with Treeview + / - - From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>
• RE: Overwhelmed with Treeview + / - - From: "Karl Stubsjoen" <karl@e...>
• Re: XML Schema - Enumerated List to Allow Blank Value - From: Eddie Robertsson <erobertsson@a...>
• Overwhelmed with Treeview + / - - From: "Karl Stubsjoen" <karl@e...>
• Re[2]: Tree View + / - Lists with XSL - From: "Vasil I. Yaroshevich" <shade33@m...>
• RE: Tree View + / - Lists with XSL - From: "Karl Stubsjoen" <karl@e...>
• Re: Tree View + / - Lists with XSL - From: "Vasil I. Yaroshevich" <shade33@m...>
• RE: Reality check needed .... - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• Re: another naieve question - valid characters for ID values - From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published - From: Micah Dubinko <MDubinko@c...>
• RE: ADMINISTRIVIA: list server / archive problems? - From: "Karl F. Best" <karl.best@o...>
• Cover Pages Update - From: "Karl F. Best" <karl.best@o...>
• ADMINISTRIVIA: list server / archive problems? - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: another naieve question - valid characters for ID values - From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• RE: RE: Tree View + / - Lists with XSL - From: "Karl Stubsjoen" <karl@e...>
• Re: Reality check needed .... - From: amyzing@t... (Amelia A Lewis)
• RE: RE: Tree View + / - Lists with XSL - From: "James Fuller" <james.fuller@o...>
• Re: RE: Tree View + / - Lists with XSL - From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Re: another naieve question - valid characters for ID values - From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• RE: Iceberg development (was Re: maps) - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• Slides: Out-of-line markup - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• RE: another naieve question - valid characters for ID values - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• another naieve question - valid characters for ID values - From: Rick Jones <rick_jones2@h...>
• RE: Tree View + / - Lists with XSL - From: "James Fuller" <james.fuller@o...>
• xml-dev topic schedule - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• RE: Tree View + / - Lists with XSL - From: "Karl Stubsjoen" <karl@e...>
• RE: Tree View + / - Lists