• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
• Subject: Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?
• From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@y...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r01050300-1015-F29E9050AF8911D683CE0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
• Reply-to: jim@a...

--- "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> wrote:
> On the transparency, sending XML, even XML fragments, seems easier to
> deal with than most message formats, though you could preserve the
> transparency by using an XML-based message format.  Even XML-RPC for
> SAX2 seems like a lot, though.

Perhaps you could be even more transparent by using the XML-based Binary
Lexical Octet Ad-hoc Transport[1] under XML-RPC. ;-)

Jim

[1] - RFC 3252: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3252.txt


=====
Jim Ancona
jim@a...                     jancona@x...

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com

• References:
  • Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?
• Next by Date: Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?
• Previous by thread: RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?
• Next by thread: RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread