XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by thread - August, 2002

• Simple easy to use Java XML parser and data type, Ricardo Zuasti
• Microsoft XML Diff and Patch 1.0 available, Dare Obasanjo
• RE: Is W3C Losing the Plot?, Klotz, Leigh
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Is W3C Losing the Plot?, Klotz, Leigh
• Re: Byzantine schism, AndrewWatt2000
  • RE: Byzantine schism, Didier PH Martin
  • Re: Byzantine schism, John Cowan
  • Re: Byzantine schism, Arjun Ray
    • RE: Is W3C Losing the Plot?, Mike Champion
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Byzantine schism, AndrewWatt2000
• Byzantine schism, Didier PH Martin
  • RE: Byzantine schism, Didier PH Martin
    • Re: Byzantine schism, J.Pietschmann
    • Re: Byzantine schism, Tim Bray
      • Re: Byzantine schism, Arjun Ray
  • Re: Byzantine schism, Henry S. Thompson
    • RE: Byzantine schism, Didier PH Martin
  • Re: Byzantine schism, Erik Wilde
• Is W3C Losing the Plot?, AndrewWatt2000
  • Re: Is W3C Losing the Plot?, Paul Prescod
    • RE: Is W3C Losing the Plot?, Didier PH Martin
• RE: inheritance by restriction, Phil Fuhlman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: inheritance by restriction, Dare Obasanjo
• inheritance by restriction, Maciejewski, Thomas
• RE: xml schema, Maciejewski, Thomas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: xml schema, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: xml schema, Maciejewski, Thomas
  • RE: xml schema, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: xml schema, Paul Brown
• RE: what parsers support xml schema, Dare Obasanjo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: what parsers support xml schema, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: what parsers support xml schema, Murali Mani
  • RE: what parsers support xml schema, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: what parsers support xml schema, Murali Mani
  • RE: what parsers support xml schema, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: what parsers support xml schema, Murali Mani
  • RE: what parsers support xml schema, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: what parsers support xml schema, Murali Mani
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], Wayne Steele
• what parsers support xml schema, Maciejewski, Thomas
  • Re: what parsers support xml schema, Matt Gushee
  • Re: what parsers support xml schema, Murali Mani
• xml schema, Maciejewski, Thomas
  • Re: xml schema, Tim Bray
• First TAG WD published, Tim Bray
• Re: XLink and XForms, AndrewWatt2000
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XLink and XForms, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
    • Re: XLink and XForms, J.Pietschmann
      • Re: XLink and XForms, Arjun Ray
      • Re: XLink and XForms, Jeni Tennison
• ADMINISTRIVIA: Wondering if I can post ..., Mike Champion
• XLink WG new charter, AndrewWatt2000
  • Re: XLink WG new charter, John Cowan
• XLink and XForms, AndrewWatt2000
  • RE: XLink and XForms, Didier PH Martin
    • Re: XLink and XForms, David Carlisle
      • RE: XLink and XForms, Didier PH Martin
      • Re: XLink and XForms, J.Pietschmann
      • Re: XLink and XForms, Arjun Ray
  • Re: XLink and XForms, Erik Wilde
    • Re: XLink and XForms, Arjun Ray
      • Re: XLink and XForms, Erik Wilde
      • Re: XLink and XForms, Arjun Ray
• [ANN] Pollo 0.3.4 XML editor released, Bruno Dumon
• conversion of XML to DBF, Valeri.Kireitchik
• RE: Why is there no schema for RSS?, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: Why is there no schema for RSS?, Leigh Dodds
• Why is there no schema for RSS?, Dare Obasanjo
  • Re: Why is there no schema for RSS?, Joe English
    • Re: Why is there no schema for RSS?, Paul Prescod
  • RE: Why is there no schema for RSS?, Peter Drayton
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], Klotz, Leigh
  • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], Paul Prescod
    • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], David Carlisle
      • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], Paul Prescod
      • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], Joe English
• Used the Amazon XML toolkit?, Didier PH Martin
• RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], Dare Obasanjo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], Jeff Lowery
  • RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:, John Cowan
  • RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], Paul Prescod
  • RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], Klotz, Leigh
• RE: Linking global context, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Linking global context, John Cowan
  • RE: Linking global context, Didier PH Martin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Linking global context, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Linking global context, John Cowan
  • RE: Linking global context, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Linking global context, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Linking global context, Didier PH Martin
• RE: W3C XML Schema public home page updated: new tools, Dare Obasanjo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: W3C XML Schema public home page updated: new tools, Klotz, Leigh
• problem adding new encoding to perl XML::Parser, Daben Liu
  • Re: problem adding new encoding to perl XML::Parser, Thomas B. Passin
    • RE: problem adding new encoding to perl XML::Parser, Daben Liu
  • Re: problem adding new encoding to perl XML::Parser, Robin Berjon
• FW: Cover Pages Newsletter August 27, 2002, Karl F. Best
• Alternate for a SHOWMODALDIALOG, Raghava Krishna (CTC)
• RE: Getting dropped off the mail list, Jeff Lowery
  • Re: Getting dropped off the mail list, Thomas B. Passin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Getting dropped off the mail list, Jeff Lowery
• Getting dropped off the mail list, Jeff Lowery
  • Re: Getting dropped off the mail list, Jeff Rafter
• ASP XML help?, dale
• Absolute and relative names, John Cowan
• Another Newby question, Carlos Vicente
• Re: IBM Spam?, AndrewWatt2000
• Re: Re: How to implement getElementById() with Xerces using XMLSchema?, H.-Gerd Rosarius
• How to implement getElementById() with Xerces using XML Schema?, H.-Gerd Rosarius
  • Re: How to implement getElementById() with Xerces using XMLSchema?, Thomas B. Passin
• IBM Spam?, AndrewWatt2000
  • RE: IBM Spam?, W. Hugh Chatfield I.S.P.
• test post - please ignore, John Evdemon
• RE: XML parsers acceptance, Klotz, Leigh
• XML parsers acceptance, Naren Koka
• IETF XML principles draft, Tim Bray
• FW: Renamer-att (was: Can XLink be fixed?), Keith W. Boone
  • Re: FW: Renamer-att (was: Can XLink be fixed?), Arjun Ray
• [ANN] XML and Web Services Connections (31 Oct- 2 Nov in Orlando), Ken North
• namespaces and entities: a thought experiment, adam souzis
• Detection of non-Unicode characters, Mark Feblowitz
  • Re: Detection of non-Unicode characters, Tim Bray
    • Re: Detection of non-Unicode characters, Matt Gushee
      • Re: Detection of non-Unicode characters, J.Pietschmann
      • Re: Detection of non-Unicode characters, Ann Navarro
      • Re: Detection of non-Unicode characters, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Detection of non-Unicode characters, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Detection of non-Unicode characters, Rick Jelliffe
• RE: Architectural Forms revival?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Architectural Forms revival?, Arjun Ray
  • Re: Architectural Forms revival?, Uche Ogbuji
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Architectural Forms revival?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer?, Dare Obasanjo
  • Re: [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer?, Roger L. Costello
    • Re: [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer?, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer?, William F. Gilreath
• RE: XML indexing/search engine, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: RE: XML indexing/search engine, Mike Champion
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML indexing/search engine, Dare Obasanjo
    • XML schema/DTD for Yellow Pages, Andi S. Giri
  • RE: RE: XML indexing/search engine, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: XML indexing/search engine, Ranjeet Sonone
    • Re: XML indexing/search engine, Steve Muench
      • RE: XML indexing/search engine, Naren Chawla
      • Re: XML indexing/search engine, Steve Muench
• xmlsoftware.com is back, James Tauber
• RE: Hobbsian processes, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Hobbsian processes, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Hobbsian processes, Didier PH Martin
    • RE: Hobbsian processes, Didier PH Martin
  • RE: Hobbsian processes, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Hobbsian processes, Miles Sabin
• How to read a DTD file?, ajay somani
  • Re: How to read a DTD file?, J.Pietschmann
    • Re: How to read a DTD file?, John Cowan
• Newby question, Carlos Vicente
  • Re: Newby question, Robin Berjon
    • Re: Newby question, Carlos Vicente
  • Re: Newby question, Thomas B. Passin
• RE: Schema Sanity Check, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: Schema Sanity Check, Steven Livingstone
  • RE: Schema Sanity Check, Steven Livingstone
  • Re: Schema Sanity Check, Jeni Tennison
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Schema Sanity Check, Dare Obasanjo
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Schema Sanity Check, Steven Livingstone
• RE: More AI Reading, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• More AI Reading, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented n, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, W. E. Perry
    • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented, John Cowan
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented, W. E. Perry
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented, John Cowan
      • Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: A multi-stepapproach on defining object-oriented), Mike Champion
      • Re: Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: A multi-step, John Cowan
      • Re: Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: A multi-step, Jack Park
      • Re: Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: A multi-step, bob mcwhirter
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, W. E. Perry
• XML indexing/search engine, Roth, Scott (ITD)
  • RE: XML indexing/search engine, Dvir Ben-Aaron
    • RE: XML indexing/search engine, leon
  • Re: XML indexing/search engine, Tim Bray
    • Re: XML indexing/search engine, Mike Champion
    • Re: XML indexing/search engine, Steve Muench
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XML indexing/search engine, Farrukh Najmi
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• xml digital preservation, Freschi Marco
• XForms: New & Last WD, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, Micah Dubinko
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented n, John Cowan
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented n, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
• RE: ANN: XML Schema of measurement units, CHIUSANO, Joseph
  • Re: ANN: XML Schema of measurement units, Roger L. Costello
• URIs and XML Vocabularies As Code Systems (WAS RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • ANN: XML Schema of measurement units, Roger L. Costello
    • Re: ANN: XML Schema of measurement units, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: ANN: XML Schema of measurement units, Roger L. Costello
      • Re: ANN: XML Schema of measurement units, Thomas B. Passin
    • RE: ANN: XML Schema of measurement units, Bill de hÓra
• RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• ERPANET workshop Urbino, Italian.Editor@e...
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM, Dare Obasanjo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM, Dare Obasanjo
• RE: XSD <any> and namespaces, Dare Obasanjo
• XSD <any> and namespaces, Daniel Prager
• RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM, Mike Champion
  • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
  • RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM, Amelia A Lewis
    • RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM, Keith W. Boone
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM, John Cowan
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM, Mike Champion
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM, Paul Prescod
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM, Mike Champion
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining, John Cowan
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM, Arjun Ray
      • Re: A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM, Paul Prescod
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM, Joe English
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM, John Cowan
      • Re: A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM, Mike Champion
      • Re: A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM, Joe English
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM, John Cowan
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM, Joe English
      • Re: A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM, Thomas B. Passin
      • Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM), Jeff Rafter
      • Re: Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-stepapproach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM), Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • XHTML Modularization in RNG (was: Best Practice - Vanilla XML?), John Cowan
      • Re: Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-step approachon defining object-orientednatureof DOM), Ken Sall
      • How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ), Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ), John Cowan
      • Re: How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ), Jeff Rafter
      • Re: How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ), John Cowan
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM, Tim Bray
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM, Christopher R. Maden
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM, Rich Salz
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM, Arjun Ray
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureofDOM, Rich Salz
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureofDOM, Paul Prescod
    • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM, Tim Bray
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature, John Cowan
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, W. E. Perry
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, W. E. Perry
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, Paul Prescod
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature, John Cowan
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature, Paul Prescod
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, W. E. Perry
      • Hobbsian processes, Paul Prescod
      • Re: Hobbsian processes, Mike Champion
      • Re: Hobbsian processes, Paul Prescod
      • RE: Hobbsian processes, Didier PH Martin
      • Re: Hobbsian processes, Miles Sabin
      • RE: Hobbsian processes, Didier PH Martin
      • [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer?, Roger L. Costello
      • Re: Hobbsian processes, Mike Champion
      • Re: Hobbsian processes, W. E. Perry
    • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM, Jeff Rafter
      • Namespaces blur (A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednature of DOM), Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: Namespaces blur (A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM), Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: Namespaces blur (A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM), Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: Namespaces blur (A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM), Elliotte Rusty Harold
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM, Sam Hunting
    • Re: RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM, Mike Champion
  • RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, Aaron Skonnard
  • RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Searching a SinglNode, Karl Stubsjoen
  • A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, Margarita Isayeva
    • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM, bob mcwhirter
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM, Mike Champion
      • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM, Erik Wilde
    • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM, Eric van der Vlist
• RE: namespace reprise, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: namespace reprise, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: namespace reprise, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
    • RE: namespace reprise, Julian Reschke
      • Re: namespace reprise, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
      • RE: namespace reprise, Julian Reschke
      • Re: namespace reprise, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
      • RE: namespace reprise, Julian Reschke
      • Re: namespace reprise, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
      • RE: namespace reprise, Julian Reschke
      • Re: namespace reprise, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
      • RE: namespace reprise, Julian Reschke
      • Re: namespace reprise, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
      • RE: namespace reprise, Julian Reschke
      • Re: namespace reprise, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
      • Re: namespace reprise, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: namespace reprise, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
      • Re: namespace reprise, Joe English
      • Re: namespace reprise, james anderson
  • Re: namespace reprise, Robin Berjon
  • Re: namespace revise, Marcus Carr
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: namespace reprise, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: namespace reprise, Miles Sabin
  • RE: namespace reprise, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: namespace reprise, Simon St.Laurent
    • RE: namespace reprise, Ann Navarro
  • RE: namespace reprise, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: namespace reprise, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
    • Re: namespace reprise, Matt Gushee
  • RE: namespace reprise, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: namespace reprise, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
      • Re: namespace reprise, james anderson
      • Re: namespace reprise, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
    • Re: namespace reprise, Miles Sabin
  • RE: namespace reprise, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: namespace reprise, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
      • RE: namespace reprise, Julian Reschke
  • RE: namespace reprise, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: namespace reprise, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: namespace reprise, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: namespace reprise, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• namespace reprise, Simon St.Laurent
• RE: Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents ), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • filemaker pro, xml and rtf documents, David Nyberg, M.D.
  • Re: Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ), Arjun Ray
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ), Jon Noring
  • RE: Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents ), Paul Prescod
  • RE: Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents ), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents ), Tim Bray
    • RE: Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ), Keith W. Boone
• RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, John Cowan
  • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
    • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, John Cowan
  • RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: RDFInterpretation of XML documents ), Mike Champion
  • RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, John Cowan
    • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
    • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, Thomas B. Passin
  • RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
  • RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
    • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, Thomas B. Passin
  • RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
  • RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d ev] patterns vs. identifiers), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Namespace declaration versus attribute, Amelia A Lewis
  • Re: Namespace declaration versus attribute, Kian-Tat Lim
    • Re: Namespace declaration versus attribute, Amelia A Lewis
      • Re: Namespace declaration versus attribute, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: Namespace declaration versus attribute, Elliotte Rusty Harold
  • RE: Namespace declaration versus attribute, Bill de hÓra
• RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: patterns vs. identifiers), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: patterns vs. identifiers), Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, John Cowan
    • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, John Cowan
      • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, Tim Bray
      • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, John Cowan
      • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d, Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d ev] patterns vs. identifiers), Uche Ogbuji
• ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser, Tim Bray
    • Re: ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser, Simon St.Laurent
• Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:, AndrewWatt2000
  • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:, Erik Wilde
    • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:, Daniel Veillard
  • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:, Amelia A Lewis
    • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:, Mike Champion
    • xml corpus, bryan
    • xml corpus - disregard, bryan
    • OT svg display in IE question, performance, bryan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:, AndrewWatt2000
  • RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Is the XLink WG currently chartered or not?, AndrewWatt2000
  • Re: Is the XLink WG currently chartered or not?, Henry S. Thompson
  • Re: Is the XLink WG currently chartered or not?, John Cowan
• RE: Newbie confusion with xml, Mark Seaborne
• XML Tokenizer - a free, simple open-source XML Parser, William F. Gilreath
  • Re: XML Tokenizer - a free, simple open-source XML Parser, Tim Bray
• Saving XML Docs on web, Karl Stubsjoen
  • Re: Saving XML Docs on web, Matt Gushee
    • RE: Saving XML Docs on web, Karl Stubsjoen
• RE: patterns vs. identifiers, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Sean McGrath
• patterns vs. identifiers, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Jeff Rafter
    • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Mike Champion
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Jeff Rafter
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Mike Champion
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Mike Haarman
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Arjun Ray
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Arjun Ray
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Arjun Ray
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, John Cowan
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Mike Champion
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Paul Prescod
  • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Paul Prescod
    • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Thomas B. Passin
    • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Miles Sabin
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Paul Prescod
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: patterns vs. identifiers, Bill de hÓra
      • RE: patterns vs. identifiers, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: patterns vs. identifiers, Bill de hÓra
      • RE: patterns vs. identifiers, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: patterns vs. identifiers, Bill de hÓra
      • RE: patterns vs. identifiers, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: patterns vs. identifiers, Bill de hÓra
      • RE: patterns vs. identifiers, Bill de hÓra
      • RE: patterns vs. identifiers, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
      • RE: patterns vs. identifiers, Bill de hÓra
      • RE: patterns vs. identifiers, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Mike Champion
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Paul Prescod
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Arjun Ray
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Arjun Ray
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Paul Prescod
      • RE: patterns vs. identifiers, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Mike Champion
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, John Cowan
      • RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: patterns vs.identifiers), Mike Champion
      • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: patterns vs. identifiers), Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: patterns vs., John Cowan
      • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: patterns vs. identifiers), Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Miles Sabin
      • Re: patterns vs. identifiers, Simon St.Laurent
• Newbie confusion with xml, dale
  • Re: Newbie confusion with xml, Mike Champion
• CDATA section, Yu Ye Zhou
  • Re: CDATA section, Mike Brown
• RE: Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: WXS acronym?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Do sheep dream of electric URLs?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Just-In-Time-Trees (JITTs), Patrick Durusau
• [ANN] <oXygen/> XML Editor 1.2.2, George Cristian Bina
• XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20), AndrewWatt2000
  • Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20), Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20), Lars Marius Garshol
      • Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20), Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
      • Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20), Lars Marius Garshol
      • Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20), Joe English
      • Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20), Lars Marius Garshol
      • Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20), Lars Marius Garshol
      • RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20), Bill de hÓra
      • Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20), Lars Marius Garshol
      • RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20), Bill de hÓra
      • Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20), Lars Marius Garshol
      • RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20), Bill de hÓra
      • Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20), Lars Marius Garshol
      • RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20), Bill de hÓra
      • Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20), Lars Marius Garshol
      • RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20), Bill de hÓra
      • What is this IDs/pattern rot?, Uche Ogbuji
  • RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20), Jelks Cabaniss
    • Re: RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20), Rick Jelliffe
• RE: XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear, CHIUSANO, Joseph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear, CHIUSANO, Joseph
  • RE: XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear, CHIUSANO, Joseph
• XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear, CHIUSANO, Joseph
  • Re: XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear, Henry S. Thompson
• Re: linking, 80/20, Erik Wilde
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: linking, 80/20, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: linking, 80/20, AndrewWatt2000
  • RE: linking, 80/20, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: linking, 80/20, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: linking, 80/20, Didier PH Martin
    • Re: linking, 80/20, John Cowan
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: linking, 80/20, John Cowan
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Norman Walsh
  • Re: linking, 80/20, AndrewWatt2000
  • Re: linking, 80/20, AndrewWatt2000
    • Re: linking, 80/20, Tim Bray
  • RE: linking, 80/20, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: linking, 80/20, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: linking, 80/20, AndrewWatt2000
  • RE: linking, 80/20, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: linking, 80/20, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• linking, 80/20, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: linking, 80/20, John Cowan
    • Re: linking, 80/20, Ben Trafford
    • Re: linking, 80/20, Paul Prescod
      • RE: linking, 80/20, Didier PH Martin
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Henrik Motakef
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Ann Navarro
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Paul Prescod
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Paul Prescod
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Simon St.Laurent
      • Linking solutions, Paul Prescod
      • Re: Linking solutions, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Erik Wilde
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Erik Wilde
      • Infoset chewing gum (was Re: linking, 80/20), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Infoset chewing gum (was Re: linking, 80/20), Erik Wilde
      • Re: Infoset chewing gum (was Re: linking, 80/20), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Infoset chewing gum (was Re: linking, 80/20), Tim Bray
      • Re: Infoset chewing gum (was Re: linking, 80/20), Erik Wilde
      • Re: Infoset chewing gum (was Re: linking, 80/20), Paul Prescod
      • RE: Infoset chewing gum (was Re: linking, 80/20), Didier PH Martin
      • Re: Infoset chewing gum (was Re: linking, 80/20), Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Amelia A Lewis
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Erik Wilde
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Tim Bray
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Amelia A Lewis
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Erik Wilde
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Amelia A Lewis
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Erik Wilde
      • the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], Erik Wilde
      • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: linking, 80/20], Amelia A Lewis
      • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:, John Cowan
      • RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:, bryan
      • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:, Amelia A Lewis
      • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: linking, 80/20], Erik Wilde
      • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: linking, 80/20], Erik Wilde
      • shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies), Tim Bray
      • Re: shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies), Erik Wilde
      • Re: shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies), Erik Wilde
      • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: linking, 80/20], Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], Jelks Cabaniss
      • RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], Aaron Skonnard
      • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], John Cowan
      • RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], Aaron Skonnard
      • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], John Cowan
      • RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], Aaron Skonnard
      • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], Paul Prescod
      • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], Arjun Ray
      • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], John Cowan
      • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], Mike Champion
      • RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20], Aaron Skonnard
      • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: linking, 80/20], Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
      • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: linking, 80/20], Tim Bray
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: linking, 80/20, John Cowan
      • RE: linking, 80/20, Jelks Cabaniss
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Paul Prescod
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Arjun Ray
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Paul Prescod
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Arjun Ray
      • RE: linking, 80/20, Jelks Cabaniss
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Ann Navarro
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Ann Navarro
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Ann Navarro
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Erik Wilde
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Ann Navarro
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Erik Wilde
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Paul Prescod
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Erik Wilde
      • RE: linking, 80/20, Didier PH Martin
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Thomas B. Passin
      • RE: linking, 80/20, Jelks Cabaniss
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Uche Ogbuji
  • RE: linking, 80/20, Jelks Cabaniss
  • Architectural Forms revival?, Uche Ogbuji
    • Re: Architectural Forms revival?, Ann Navarro
      • Re: Architectural Forms revival?, Uche Ogbuji
    • APEX (was Re: Architectural Forms revival?), Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: Architectural Forms revival?, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Architectural Forms revival?, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Architectural Forms revival?, Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: linking, 80/20, Uche Ogbuji
    • Re: linking, 80/20, Arjun Ray
      • RE: linking, 80/20, Jelks Cabaniss
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Arjun Ray
      • RE: linking, 80/20, Jelks Cabaniss
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Arjun Ray
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Alaric B. Snell
      • Re: linking, 80/20, Arjun Ray
• Fwd: infoset data model, Simon St.Laurent
• Do sheep dream of electric URLs?, Danny Ayers
  • Re: Do sheep dream of electric URLs?, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: Do sheep dream of electric URLs?, Ian Graham
      • Re: Do sheep dream of electric URLs?, John Cowan
      • Re: Do sheep dream of electric URLs?, Jim Ancona
      • Re: Do sheep dream of electric URLs?, Marcus Carr
    • RE: Do sheep dream of electric URLs?, Didier PH Martin
    • Re: Do sheep dream of electric URLs?, John Cowan
    • URI types and functionality (Re: Do sheep dream of electricURLs?), Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
  • RE: Do sheep dream of electric URLs?, Didier PH Martin
  • Re: Do sheep dream of electric URLs?, John Cowan
• Announcement: new Grammar Test Pages for XQuery1.0 and XPath2.0, Massimo Marchiori
• Announcement: New W3C specifications of XQuery and XPath2, Massimo Marchiori
• RE: RE: XQuery subset (was RE: WXS acronym?), Dare Obasanjo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: RE: XQuery subset (was RE: WXS acronym?), Dare Obasanjo
• XForms etc Terminology (Was: WXS acronym?), AndrewWatt2000
• RE: Hypertext and complexity (was RE: XML, hypertext), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: RE: XQuery subset (was RE: WXS acronym?), Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: RE: XQuery subset (was RE: WXS acronym?), Jonathan Robie
• RE: XQuery subset (was RE: WXS acronym?), Dare Obasanjo
  • Re: RE: XQuery subset (was RE: WXS acronym?), Jonathan Robie
• RE: XML-Schema Help, Dare Obasanjo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML-Schema Help, CHIUSANO, Joseph
    • Re: XML-Schema Help, Bryce K. Nielsen
    • Re: XML-Schema Help, Jeni Tennison
  • RE: XML-Schema Help, Dave Yancey
  • RE: XML-Schema Help, Dave Yancey
  • RE: XML-Schema Help, Ranjeet Sonone
  • Re: XML-Schema Help, Dave Yancey
    • RE: XML-Schema Help, Priscilla Walmsley
  • RE: XML-Schema Help, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: XML-Schema Help, Ranjeet Sonone
    • RE: XML-Schema Help, Priscilla Walmsley
  • RE: XML-Schema Help, Doug Rudder
    • Re: XML-Schema Help, John Cowan
  • RE: XML-Schema Help, Ranjeet Sonone
    • Re: XML-Schema Help, John Cowan
  • RE: XML-Schema Help, Ranjeet Sonone
    • Re: XML-Schema Help, John Cowan
• RE: XMLHTTP Posts and performance, McNally, David
• XML-Schema Help, Dave Yancey
  • Re: XML-Schema Help, Bryce K. Nielsen
  • Re: XML-Schema Help, Henry S. Thompson
• (Fwd) Re: WXS acronym?, Matt Gushee
• RE: WXS acronym?, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: WXS acronym?, Don Park
    • RE: WXS acronym?, Michael Leditschke
      • Re: WXS acronym?, Eddie Robertsson
      • RE: WXS acronym?, Michael Leditschke
      • Re: WXS acronym?, Eddie Robertsson
      • Re: WXS acronym?, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: WXS acronym?, Eddie Robertsson
      • Re: WXS acronym?, Henry S. Thompson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: WXS acronym?, AndrewWatt2000
  • Re: WXS acronym?, AndrewWatt2000
    • Re: WXS acronym?, Jonathan Robie
  • Re: WXS acronym?, AndrewWatt2000
  • Re: WXS acronym?, AndrewWatt2000
  • RE: WXS acronym?, Dare Obasanjo
    • XQuery subset (was RE: WXS acronym?), Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: WXS acronym?, AndrewWatt2000
    • Re: WXS acronym?, Matt Gushee
      • Re: WXS acronym?, John Cowan
    • Re: WXS acronym?, John Cowan
  • Re: WXS acronym?, AndrewWatt2000
  • Re: WXS acronym?, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: WXS acronym?, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: WXS acronym?, AndrewWatt2000
• RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Didier PH Martin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, AndrewWatt2000
    • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Ann Navarro
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Ann Navarro
      • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Didier PH Martin
    • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Didier PH Martin
• WXS acronym?, Jonathan Robie
  • Re: WXS acronym?, Henry S. Thompson
    • Re: WXS acronym?, Jonathan Robie
      • Re: WXS acronym?, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: WXS acronym?, Paul Spencer
    • Re: WXS acronym?, Francis Norton
      • Re: WXS acronym?, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: WXS acronym?, Francis Norton
      • Acronym spaces, namespaces,and authority (was Re: WXS acronym?), Mike Champion
      • Re: Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: WXS acronym?), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Acronym spaces, namespaces,and authority (was Re: WXS acronym?), Paul Prescod
      • Re: Acronym spaces,namespaces,and authority (was Re: WXS acronym?), Mike Champion
      • Re: Acronym spaces, namespaces,and authority (was Re:, John Cowan
      • Re: Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: WXS acronym?), Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: WXS acronym?), John Cowan
      • Re: Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: WXS acronym?), Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: WXS acronym?, Jim Ancona
  • Re: WXS acronym?, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: WXS acronym?, John Cowan
    • Re: WXS acronym?, Jonathan Robie
      • Re: WXS acronym?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: WXS acronym?, Jonathan Robie
      • Re: WXS acronym?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: WXS acronym?, Jonathan Robie
      • Re: WXS acronym?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: WXS acronym?, Jonathan Robie
      • Re: WXS acronym?, Bryce K. Nielsen
      • Re: WXS acronym?, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: WXS acronym?, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: WXS acronym?, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: WXS acronym?, John Cowan
  • Re: WXS acronym?, John Cowan
• RE: XML, hypertext, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Hypertext and complexity (was RE: XML, hypertext), Mike Champion
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML, hypertext, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: XML, hypertext, Jack Park
      • RE: XML, hypertext, Bob DuCharme
  • RE: XML, hypertext, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: XML, hypertext, Jelks Cabaniss
  • RE: XML, hypertext, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: XML, hypertext, Didier PH Martin
    • RE: XML, hypertext, Didier PH Martin
  • RE: XML, hypertext, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: XML, hypertext, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: XML, hypertext, Didier PH Martin
  • RE: XML, hypertext, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: XML, hypertext, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: XML, hypertext, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• XML, hypertext, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: XML, hypertext, Bob DuCharme
    • RE: XML, hypertext, Didier PH Martin
    • Re: XML, hypertext, Simon St.Laurent
• Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed), John Cowan
• RE: XML is not being Validated against schema...?, Dare Obasanjo
• XML is not being Validated against schema...?, SISCO
  • RE: XML is not being Validated against schema...?, Steven Livingstone
• RE: XML Schema for large database, CHIUSANO, Joseph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML Schema for large database, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: XML Schema for large database, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: XML Schema for large database, Bill Riegel
  • RE: XML Schema for large database, Jeff Lowery
• XMLHTTP Posts and performance, Karl Stubsjoen
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• XML Schema for large database, Bill Riegel
• XML 2002 announces keynotes and early registration discount..save over $300.00 now, Elledge, Marion
• file system or http, Falls, Travis D (CASD, IT)
  • Re: file system or http, Kal Ahmed
• WSFL Question, CHIUSANO, Joseph
  • Re: WSFL Question, bob mcwhirter
    • Re: WSFL Question, Mike Champion
• RE: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed), Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed), John Cowan
  • RE: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed), Jeff Lowery
  • RE: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed), Manos Batsis
    • Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed), John Cowan
• Java SAX Speed (Was: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?), Jochen Wiedmann
• TAG posts draft web architecture doc for review, Mike Champion
• CfP: Open Source implementation of JAXB, Jochen Wiedmann
• RE: Mapping URLs to Qnames to Schema types, Manos Batsis
• RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, Dare Obasanjo
  • Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, Roger L. Costello
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, Mike Champion
      • RE: RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, Bill de hÓra
    • RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, Didier PH Martin
      • Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, Roger L. Costello
      • Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, Jim Ancona
      • Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, Francis Norton
      • RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, Didier PH Martin
    • Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, Bob Hutchison
      • Is XML Ubiquitous yet? (was Re: Pushing SAX events out ontothe Web?), Mike Champion
      • Re: Is XML Ubiquitous yet? (was Re: PushingSAX events out onto the Web?), Bob Hutchison
      • RE: Is XML Ubiquitous yet? (was Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?), bryan
      • Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, John Cowan
      • RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, Didier PH Martin
      • Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, John Cowan
  • Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, Sean McGrath
• Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, Roger L. Costello
  • Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, Mike Champion
  • Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, Leigh Dodds
    • Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, Roger L. Costello
      • Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, Leigh Dodds
      • Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?, Jim Ancona
• RE: Types (again), Jeff Lowery
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Types (again), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Types (again), Jeff Lowery
• Transform XML and Stylesheets, Karl Stubsjoen
  • RE: Transform XML and Stylesheets, Karl Stubsjoen
• RE: W3C Schema profiling and risk analysis, CHIUSANO, Joseph
• W3C Schema profiling and risk analysis, Bob DuCharme
  • Re: W3C Schema profiling and risk analysis, Dare Obasanjo
• Semantic Web Maintenance (WAS RE: P2P and URIs), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Root Document Node, Dare Obasanjo
• Root Document Node, Karl Stubsjoen
  • Re: Root Document Node, Mike Champion
• Mapping URLs to Qnames to Schema types, Manos Batsis
• SQL 2k or XML?, Falls, Travis D (CASD, IT)
  • Re: SQL 2k or XML?, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: SQL 2k or XML?, Mike Champion
• Types (again), Sean McGrath
  • Formulae and Patterns (again) (Was: Types (again)), W. E. Perry
    • Re: Formulae and Patterns (again) (Was: Types (again)), Mike Haarman
• RE: P2P and URIs, Dare Obasanjo
  • Re: P2P and URIs, Paul Prescod
    • Re: P2P and URIs, Mike Champion
      • Re: P2P and URIs, Paul Prescod
      • Re: P2P and URIs, Mike Champion
      • Re: P2P and URIs, Dare Obasanjo
      • Re: P2P and URIs, Mark Baker
    • Message not available
      • Re: P2P and URIs, Paul Prescod
      • Re: P2P and URIs, Rich Salz
• P2P and URIs, Paul Prescod
• RE: XLink 2.0 Requirements, Micah Dubinko
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XLink 2.0 Requirements, AndrewWatt2000
  • RE: XLink 2.0 Requirements, Manos Batsis
  • Re: XLink 2.0 Requirements, Simon St.Laurent
• RDDL and RDF and RSS, Doug Ransom
  • Re: RDDL and RDF and RSS, Mike Champion
• away for awhile, jborden
• RE: URIs == the Web was: Re: quarantining namespaces, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: URIs == the Web was: Re: quarantining namespaces, jborden
  • RE: URIs == the Web was: Re: quarantining namespaces, Joshua Allen
• Duality was: Re: quarantining namespaces, jborden
• URIs == the Web was: Re: quarantining namespaces, jborden
  • Re: URIs == the Web was: Re: quarantining namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: URIs == the Web was: Re: quarantining namespaces, John Cowan
      • Re: URIs == the Web was: Re: quarantining namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: URIs == the Web was: Re: quarantining namespaces, Paul Prescod
      • Re: URIs == the Web was: Re: quarantining namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
• RE: Analogy (was RE: quarantiningnamespaces), SISCO
• RE: Analogy (was RE: quarantining namespaces), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Analogy (was RE: quarantining namespaces), James Fuller
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Analogy (was RE: quarantining namespaces), Jeff Lowery
• RE: quarantining namespaces, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: quarantining namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: quarantining namespaces, jborden
    • RE: quarantining namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: quarantining namespaces, Joe English
      • Re: quarantining namespaces, Paul Prescod
      • Re: quarantining namespaces, John Cowan
      • Re: quarantining namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: quarantining namespaces, Paul Prescod
      • Re: quarantining namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: quarantining namespaces, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: quarantining namespaces, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: quarantining namespaces, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: quarantining namespaces, Paul Prescod
  • RE: quarantining namespaces, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: quarantining namespaces, James Fuller
    • Re: quarantining namespaces, Paul Prescod
  • RE: quarantining namespaces, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Analogy (was RE: quarantining namespaces), Mike Champion
      • Re: Analogy (was RE: quarantining namespaces), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Analogy (was RE: quarantining namespaces), Mike Champion
  • RE: quarantining namespaces, Jeff Lowery
• rng 2 xmi, Bill de hÓra
  • RE: rng 2 xmi, bryan
• XLink 2.0 Requirements, Micah Dubinko
  • Re: XLink 2.0 Requirements, Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Complex or Simple content usage, Danny Vint
  • Re: Complex or Simple content usage, Jeni Tennison
• how would one define credible linking?, Devon Y.
  • Re: how would one define credible linking?, Uche Ogbuji
    • RE: how would one define credible linking?, bryan
• XML "needs" a credible linking specification? Discuss., AndrewWatt2000
  • RE: XML "needs" a credible linking specification? Discuss., bryan
    • Re: XML "needs" a credible linking specification? Discuss., Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: XML "needs" a credible linking specification? Discuss., Uche Ogbuji
    • Re: XML "needs" a credible linking specification? Discuss., Jonathan Robie
• RE: Comparable considered necessary, Dare Obasanjo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Paul Brown
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Manos Batsis
    • Re: Comparable considered necessary, John Cowan
      • Re: Comparable considered necessary, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Comparable considered necessary, John Cowan
      • Re: Comparable considered necessary, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Comparable considered necessary, John Cowan
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Manos Batsis
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Bill de hÓra
    • Re: Comparable considered necessary, Paul Prescod
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Manos Batsis
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Bill de hÓra
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Manos Batsis
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Paul Brown
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Manos Batsis
    • Re: Comparable considered necessary, John Cowan
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Comparable considered necessary, John Cowan
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Manos Batsis
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Comparable considered necessary, John Cowan
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Comparable considered necessary, John Cowan
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Comparable considered necessary, Paul Prescod
      • Re: Comparable considered necessary, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Comparable considered necessary, Tim Bray
      • Re: Comparable considered necessary, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Bill de hÓra
    • Re: Comparable considered necessary, Paul Prescod
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Manos Batsis
• how to se the transformed output..., sandr8
  • Re: how to se the transformed output..., Bjoern Hoehrmann
    • Re: how to se the transformed output..., sandr8
      • Re: how to se the transformed output..., sandr8
• quarantining namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: quarantining namespaces, Robin Berjon
• XLink olden days, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: XLink olden days, Uche Ogbuji
    • Re: XLink olden days, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: XLink olden days, Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: XLink olden days, Lars Marius Garshol
      • Re: XLink olden days, Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: XLink olden days, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: XLink olden days, Paul Prescod
      • Re: XLink olden days, John Cowan
      • Re: XLink olden days, Lars Marius Garshol
      • Re: XLink olden days, Paul Prescod
      • Re: XLink olden days, Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: XLink olden days, Paul Prescod
      • Re: XLink olden days, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: XLink olden days, Ann Navarro
      • Re: XLink olden days, John Cowan
      • Re: XLink olden days, Simon St.Laurent
      • Comparable considered necessary, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Comparable considered necessary, Danny Ayers
      • Re: Comparable considered necessary, Joe English
      • Re: Comparable considered necessary, Simon St.Laurent
• Upload Carriage returns Form, Karl Stubsjoen
• actually, Dean James Greenwood
• writing DOM contents to a File or String?, Dean James Greenwood
• RE: FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Is it time for the 80/20 thread yet?, Jeff Lowery
• RE: FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002, Mike Haarman
    • Re: FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002, Jim Keohane
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: RE: FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002, Jeff Lowery
  • Re: RE: FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra,11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002, Mike Champion
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, AndrewWatt2000
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Micah Dubinko
  • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, AndrewWatt2000
    • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Masayasu Ishikawa
  • RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Micah Dubinko
    • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Tim Bray
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Ann Navarro
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Ann Navarro
  • RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Micah Dubinko
    • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, AndrewWatt2000
  • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, AndrewWatt2000
    • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Tim Bray
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death), Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death), Arjun Ray
      • Re: Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death), John Cowan
      • Re: Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death), Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death), Arjun Ray
      • Re: Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death), Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death), Arjun Ray
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Tim Bray
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Didier PH Martin
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Ann Navarro
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Ben Trafford
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Ben Trafford
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Ann Navarro
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Christopher R. Maden
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Tim Bray
      • XLink and XML specs (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death ofXLink and XPointer?), Mike Champion
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Jelks Cabaniss
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Jelks Cabaniss
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Mike Champion
      • Editor's Concrete Syntax (ECS), Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Chris Croome
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Uche Ogbuji
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Ann Navarro
      • global markup (was Re: XHTML 2.0, death of XLink), Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Jelks Cabaniss
  • RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: XPointer architecture (Re: XPointer and XML Schema), Eric van der Vlist
• W3C Standards and Vendor Support, CHIUSANO, Joseph
  • RE: W3C Standards and Vendor Support, Danny Ayers
• About XSLT and the recent mail to me, Murali Mani
• RE: Multidimensional XML, Kakade Mangesh
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Multidimensional XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Multidimensional XML, bryan
  • RE: Multidimensional XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Multidimensional XML, Kakade Mangesh
  • RE: Multidimensional XML, James Fuller
    • RE: Multidimensional XML, bryan
• XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, AndrewWatt2000
  • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Jeff Rafter
  • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Masayasu Ishikawa
    • Re: Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, John Cowan
  • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Norman Walsh
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Henry S. Thompson
  • Can XLink be fixed?, Norman Walsh
    • Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Norman Walsh
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Tim Bray
      • Message not available
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Tim Bray
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Tim Bray
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Ann Navarro
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Tim Bray
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Tim Bray
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Norman Walsh
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Bob DuCharme
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Ann Navarro
      • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Ann Navarro
      • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Ben Trafford
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Matt Gushee
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Ben Trafford
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Arjun Ray
      • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Ann Navarro
      • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Ben Trafford
      • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Ben Trafford
      • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Didier PH Martin
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Uche Ogbuji
      • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Ann Navarro
      • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Ben Trafford
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Ben Trafford
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Tearing the Hyperlink Problem Apart (was Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?), Ben Trafford
      • RE: Tearing the Hyperlink Problem Apart (was Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?), Didier PH Martin
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Lars Marius Garshol
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Norman Walsh
      • SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed), John Cowan
      • Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed), Mike Champion
      • Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed), John Cowan
      • Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed), Mike Champion
      • RE: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed), Didier PH Martin
      • Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed), John Cowan
      • Re: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed), John Cowan
      • Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed), Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Joe English
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Rick Jelliffe
      • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Keith W. Boone
      • Renamer-att (was: Can XLink be fixed?), Arjun Ray
      • Re: Renamer-att (was: Can XLink be fixed?), Arjun Ray
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Norman Walsh
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Paul Prescod
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Paul Prescod
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Norman Walsh
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Gah, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Norman Walsh
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Robin Berjon
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, J. David Eisenberg
      • CSS processing (was Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Norman Walsh
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, J. David Eisenberg
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Norman Walsh
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Robin Berjon
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Norman Walsh
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Shane McCarron
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Norman Walsh
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?, Robin Berjon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?, Niklas Gustavsson
• FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002, Bill de hÓra
• XML Core WG would appreciate test cases for XInclude, John Cowan
• Is it time for the 80/20 thread yet?, Mike Champion
  • Re: Is it time for the 80/20 thread yet?, Francis Norton
• RE: code challenge, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: code challenge, Toivo \"Deutsch\" Lainevool
    • Re: code challenge, Morten Primdahl
  • RE: code challenge, Danny Ayers
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: code challenge, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: code challenge, Danny Ayers
  • RE: code challenge, Paul Brown
    • RE: code challenge, Danny Ayers
• code challenge, Danny Ayers
• IE6, XSL and The Web (was: RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains), Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
  • Re: IE6, XSL and The Web (was: RE: What the .... ?Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains), Thomas B. Passin
  • Re: IE6, XSL and The Web (was: RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains), George Cristian Bina
• RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
  • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Jim Ancona
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Wayne Steele
  • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
  • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Wayne Steele
  • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Joshua Allen
    • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, bryan
  • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
  • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Simon St.Laurent
    • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Jim Ancona
  • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Julian Reschke
      • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, mgushee
      • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Didier PH Martin
    • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Didier PH Martin
  • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
    • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Steven Livingstone
    • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, bryan
  • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Joshua Allen
  • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Dare Obasanjo
• =?utf-8?B?UkU6IFt4bWwtZGV2XSBtYXRjaGluZyB0ZXh0IHdpdGggcmVnZXhw?==?utf-8?B?IGluIHhwYXRo?=, =?utf-8?B?V2FubmhlZGVuLCBLbnV0?=
• RE: agreements vs. Hobbes, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• process vs. "it is", Simon St.Laurent
• agreements vs. Hobbes, Simon St.Laurent
  • XLink and Hobbes (was Re: agreements vs. Hobbes), Mike Champion
  • Re: agreements vs. Hobbes, Uche Ogbuji
• What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
• Re: ADMINISTRIVIA: list server / archive problems?, Jeffrey Lomas
  • Re: ADMINISTRIVIA: list server / archive problems?, Uche Ogbuji
• matching text with regexp in xpath, Wannheden, Knut
  • RE: matching text with regexp in xpath, James Fuller
    • Re: matching text with regexp in xpath, Uche Ogbuji
  • RE: matching text with regexp in xpath, Michael Kay
    • Re: matching text with regexp in xpath, Juan Estevan Madrigal
  • Re: matching text with regexp in xpath, Uche Ogbuji
  • RE: matching text with regexp in xpath, Danny Ayers
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: matching text with regexp in xpath, Dare Obasanjo
• Overwhelmed with Treeview + / -, Karl Stubsjoen
  • RE: Overwhelmed with Treeview + / -, Karl Stubsjoen
  • Re: Overwhelmed with Treeview + / -, Jeff Rafter
• Cover Pages Update, Karl F. Best
• ADMINISTRIVIA: list server / archive problems?, Mike Champion
  • RE: ADMINISTRIVIA: list server / archive problems?, Karl F. Best
• Slides: Out-of-line markup, Simon St.Laurent
• RE: another naieve question - valid characters for ID values, Dare Obasanjo
• another naieve question - valid characters for ID values, Rick Jones
  • Re: another naieve question - valid characters for ID values, Tim Bray
  • Re: another naieve question - valid characters for ID values, John Cowan
  • Re: another naieve question - valid characters for ID values, Joe English
    • Re: another naieve question - valid characters for ID values, Rick Jelliffe
• xml-dev topic schedule, Jeff Lowery
• RE: Tree View + / - Lists with XSL, Karl Stubsjoen
  • RE: Tree View + / - Lists with XSL, James Fuller
    • Re: RE: Tree View + / - Lists with XSL, Mike Champion
      • RE: RE: Tree View + / - Lists with XSL, James Fuller
      • RE: RE: Tree View + / - Lists with XSL, Karl Stubsjoen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: RE: Tree View + / - Lists with XSL, bryan
• Tree View + / - Lists with XSL, Karl Stubsjoen
  • RE: Tree View + / - Lists with XSL, James Fuller
  • RE: Tree View + / - Lists with XSL, Karl Stubsjoen
  • Re: Tree View + / - Lists with XSL, Vasil I. Yaroshevich
    • RE: Tree View + / - Lists with XSL, Karl Stubsjoen
      • Re[2]: Tree View + / - Lists with XSL, Vasil I. Yaroshevich
• RE: Deterministic content models???, Dare Obasanjo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Deterministic content models???, Doug Rudder
    • Re: Deterministic content models???, John Cowan
  • RE: Deterministic content models???, McNally, David
  • RE: Deterministic content models???, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: Deterministic content models???, Doug Rudder
    • Re: Deterministic content models???, John Cowan
• ANN: eXist 0.8, Wolfgang Meier
• What will happen to DOCTYPE?, Gustaf Liljegren
• RE: Markup perspective not code (was RE: Re: URIs, concrete), Sean McGrath
• XSL Transform special character into <break>, Karl Stubsjoen
  • Re: XSL Transform special character into <break>, Mike Brown
    • RE: XSL Transform special character into <break>, Karl Stubsjoen
  • RE: XSL Transform special character into <break>, Michael Kay
• Deterministic content models???, Andrew Dubinsky
  • Re: Deterministic content models???, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Deterministic content models???, John Evdemon
    • RE: Deterministic content models???, Andrew Dubinsky
      • Re: Deterministic content models???, John Cowan
      • Re: Deterministic content models???, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Deterministic content models???, Robin LaFontaine
    • RE: Deterministic content models???, Andrew Dubinsky
• Dynamic validation, Naren Koka
• Word and XML was RE: XML APIs - What's next?, Hodder, Ed
  • Re: Word and XML was RE: XML APIs - What's next?, Mike Champion
• OASIS announcement of e-Gov discussion list, Karl F. Best
• RE: CDATA strangeness, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: CDATA strangeness, Ramin Firoozye
  • RE: CDATA strangeness, Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fwd: RE: CDATA strangeness, Simon St.Laurent
• RE: Iceberg development (was Re: maps), Jeff Lowery
  • Re: Iceberg development (was Re: maps), Tim Bray
    • Re: Iceberg development (was Re: maps), Mike Champion
  • RE: Iceberg development (was Re: maps), Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Iceberg development (was Re: maps), Jeff Lowery
    • RE: Iceberg development (was Re: maps), Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: Iceberg development (was Re: maps), Jeff Lowery
    • Re: Iceberg development (was Re: maps), Uche Ogbuji
  • RE: Iceberg development (was Re: maps), Jeff Lowery
  • RE: Iceberg development (was Re: maps), Jeff Lowery
  • RE: Iceberg development (was Re: maps), Jeff Lowery
  • RE: Iceberg development (was Re: maps), Mark Seaborne
  • RE: Iceberg development (was Re: maps), Jeff Lowery
  • RE: Iceberg development (was Re: maps), Mark Seaborne
  • RE: Iceberg development (was Re: maps), Mark Seaborne
• RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published, Simon St.Laurent
    • RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published, Ann Navarro
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: W3C XFrames - first public WD published, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: W3C XFrames - first public WD published, Ann Navarro
      • Re: W3C XFrames - first public WD published, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: W3C XFrames - first public WD published, J. David Eisenberg
      • RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published, bryan
      • RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published, Ann Navarro
      • RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published, bryan
    • RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published, Ann Navarro
  • RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published, Micah Dubinko
• W3C XFrames - first public WD published, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
  • Re: W3C XFrames - first public WD published, Masayasu Ishikawa
• XML stylesheet web service, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
• markup anti-pattern, Mike Haarman
• using avt's outside xslt, Wannheden, Knut
  • RE: using avt's outside xslt, Ramin Firoozye
• XML Schema - Enumerated List to Allow Blank Value, CHIUSANO, Joseph
  • Re: XML Schema - Enumerated List to Allow Blank Value, Eddie Robertsson
    • RE: XML Schema - Enumerated List to Allow Blank Value, Michael Kay
      • Re: XML Schema - Enumerated List to Allow Blank Value, Richard Tobin