|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by thread - August, 2002
- Simple easy to use Java XML parser and data type,
Ricardo Zuasti
- Microsoft XML Diff and Patch 1.0 available,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Is W3C Losing the Plot?,
Klotz, Leigh
- Re: Byzantine schism,
AndrewWatt2000
- Byzantine schism,
Didier PH Martin
- Is W3C Losing the Plot?,
AndrewWatt2000
- RE: inheritance by restriction,
Phil Fuhlman
- inheritance by restriction,
Maciejewski, Thomas
- RE: xml schema,
Maciejewski, Thomas
- RE: what parsers support xml schema,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20],
Wayne Steele
- what parsers support xml schema,
Maciejewski, Thomas
- xml schema,
Maciejewski, Thomas
- First TAG WD published,
Tim Bray
- Re: XLink and XForms,
AndrewWatt2000
- ADMINISTRIVIA: Wondering if I can post ...,
Mike Champion
- XLink WG new charter,
AndrewWatt2000
- XLink and XForms,
AndrewWatt2000
- [ANN] Pollo 0.3.4 XML editor released,
Bruno Dumon
- conversion of XML to DBF,
Valeri.Kireitchik
- RE: Why is there no schema for RSS?,
Dare Obasanjo
- Why is there no schema for RSS?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20],
Klotz, Leigh
- Used the Amazon XML toolkit?,
Didier PH Martin
- RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20],
Dare Obasanjo
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20],
Jeff Lowery
- RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20],
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20],
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20],
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20],
Klotz, Leigh
- RE: Linking global context,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Linking global context,
Didier PH Martin
- RE: W3C XML Schema public home page updated: new tools,
Dare Obasanjo
- problem adding new encoding to perl XML::Parser,
Daben Liu
- FW: Cover Pages Newsletter August 27, 2002,
Karl F. Best
- Alternate for a SHOWMODALDIALOG,
Raghava Krishna (CTC)
- RE: Getting dropped off the mail list,
Jeff Lowery
- Getting dropped off the mail list,
Jeff Lowery
- ASP XML help?,
dale
- Absolute and relative names,
John Cowan
- Another Newby question,
Carlos Vicente
- Re: IBM Spam?,
AndrewWatt2000
- Re: Re: How to implement getElementById() with Xerces using XMLSchema?,
H.-Gerd Rosarius
- How to implement getElementById() with Xerces using XML Schema?,
H.-Gerd Rosarius
- IBM Spam?,
AndrewWatt2000
- test post - please ignore,
John Evdemon
- RE: XML parsers acceptance,
Klotz, Leigh
- XML parsers acceptance,
Naren Koka
- IETF XML principles draft,
Tim Bray
- FW: Renamer-att (was: Can XLink be fixed?),
Keith W. Boone
- [ANN] XML and Web Services Connections (31 Oct- 2 Nov in Orlando),
Ken North
- namespaces and entities: a thought experiment,
adam souzis
- Detection of non-Unicode characters,
Mark Feblowitz
- RE: Architectural Forms revival?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: XML indexing/search engine,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- xmlsoftware.com is back,
James Tauber
- RE: Hobbsian processes,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- How to read a DTD file?,
ajay somani
- Newby question,
Carlos Vicente
- RE: Schema Sanity Check,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Schema Sanity Check,
Steven Livingstone
- RE: More AI Reading,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- More AI Reading,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented n,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
W. E. Perry
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented,
John Cowan
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented,
W. E. Perry
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented,
John Cowan
- Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: A multi-stepapproach on defining object-oriented),
Mike Champion
- Re: Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: A multi-step,
John Cowan
- Re: Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: A multi-step,
Jack Park
- Re: Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: A multi-step,
bob mcwhirter
- RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- XML indexing/search engine,
Roth, Scott (ITD)
- RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- xml digital preservation,
Freschi Marco
- XForms: New & Last WD,
Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
- RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Micah Dubinko
- RE: ANN: XML Schema of measurement units,
CHIUSANO, Joseph
- URIs and XML Vocabularies As Code Systems (WAS RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- ERPANET workshop Urbino,
Italian.Editor@e...
- RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: XSD <any> and namespaces,
Dare Obasanjo
- XSD <any> and namespaces,
Daniel Prager
- RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM,
Mike Champion
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM,
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
- RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM,
Amelia A Lewis
- RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM,
Keith W. Boone
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM,
John Cowan
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Mike Champion
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Paul Prescod
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM,
Mike Champion
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining,
John Cowan
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Arjun Ray
- Re: A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM,
Paul Prescod
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Joe English
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
John Cowan
- Re: A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM,
Eric van der Vlist
- Re: A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM,
Mike Champion
- Re: A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM,
Eric van der Vlist
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Joe English
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
John Cowan
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Joe English
- Re: A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM,
Thomas B. Passin
- Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM),
Jeff Rafter
- Re: Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-stepapproach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM),
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- XHTML Modularization in RNG (was: Best Practice - Vanilla XML?),
John Cowan
- Re: Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-step approachon defining object-orientednatureof DOM),
Ken Sall
- How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ),
John Cowan
- Re: How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ),
Jeff Rafter
- Re: How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ),
John Cowan
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Tim Bray
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Christopher R. Maden
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Rich Salz
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Arjun Ray
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureofDOM,
Rich Salz
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureofDOM,
Paul Prescod
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM,
Tim Bray
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature,
John Cowan
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
W. E. Perry
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
W. E. Perry
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Paul Prescod
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature,
John Cowan
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature,
Paul Prescod
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
W. E. Perry
- Hobbsian processes,
Paul Prescod
- Re: Hobbsian processes,
Mike Champion
- Re: Hobbsian processes,
Paul Prescod
- RE: Hobbsian processes,
Didier PH Martin
- Re: Hobbsian processes,
Miles Sabin
- RE: Hobbsian processes,
Didier PH Martin
- [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer?,
Roger L. Costello
- Re: Hobbsian processes,
Mike Champion
- Re: Hobbsian processes,
W. E. Perry
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM,
Jeff Rafter
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Searching a SinglNode,
Karl Stubsjoen
- RE: namespace reprise,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: namespace reprise,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: namespace reprise,
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
- RE: namespace reprise,
Julian Reschke
- Re: namespace reprise,
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
- RE: namespace reprise,
Julian Reschke
- Re: namespace reprise,
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
- RE: namespace reprise,
Julian Reschke
- Re: namespace reprise,
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
- RE: namespace reprise,
Julian Reschke
- Re: namespace reprise,
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
- RE: namespace reprise,
Julian Reschke
- Re: namespace reprise,
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
- RE: namespace reprise,
Julian Reschke
- Re: namespace reprise,
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
- Re: namespace reprise,
Eric van d
|
Cart