• To: simonstl@s...
• Subject: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 18:08:10 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r01050300-1015-47213347A56F11D693BB0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>(simonstl@s...)
• References: <r01050300-1015-47213347A56F11D693BB0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>

> No, again you're reading too much into this.  I'm not proposing any such
> global promotion.

I know, but I think it's implied by the change (see my replies to Uche)
If the change could be worded so it clearly didn't have this seffect I
wouldn't have any problem with it as a goal, except teh usial concerns
about whether its too late to change.

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

• References:
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread