[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)

• To: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>
• Subject: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 11:11:45 -0600
• Cc: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: Message from "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...> of "Thu, 01 Aug 2002 10:02:27 PDT." <4F4182C71C1FDD4BA0937A7EB7B8B4C106028E79@r...>
• Sender: uche.ogbuji@f...

> > I'm not suggesting that unprefixed attributes should be treated as
> > global attributes.  I think you're reading far too much into the
> little
> > I've actually said.  I'm saying that in the context of a given
> element,
> > attributes should be treated as having the namespace context of their
> > containing element rather than treated as having an ambiguous
> namespace
> > context.
> 
> I'm no namespace expert, but I cannot see how you can do what you
> recommend without causing some attributes to unintentionally be promoted
> globally.

Sorry.  What does this mean?


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                                    Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net    http://4Suite.org    http://fourthought.com
Track chair, XML/Web Services One Boston: http://www.xmlconference.com/
Basic XML and RDF techniques for knowledge management, Part 7 - 
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-think12.html
Keeping pace with James Clark - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/libra
ry/x-jclark.html
Python and XML development using 4Suite, Part 3: 4RDF - 
http://www-105.ibm.com/developerworks/education.nsf/xml-onlinecourse-bytitle/8A
1EA5A2CF4621C386256BBB006F4CEC

• References:
  • RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by thread: RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread