[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)

• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>
• Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 10:02:27 -0700
• Thread-index: AcI5fGpkHDHSa3EUQgOjfAwad+xPwwAAGudw
• Thread-topic: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)

> I'm not suggesting that unprefixed attributes should be treated as
> global attributes.  I think you're reading far too much into the
little
> I've actually said.  I'm saying that in the context of a given
element,
> attributes should be treated as having the namespace context of their
> containing element rather than treated as having an ambiguous
namespace
> context.

I'm no namespace expert, but I cannot see how you can do what you
recommend without causing some attributes to unintentionally be promoted
globally.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Previous by thread: Re: Markup perspective not code (wasRE: Re: URIs, concrete)
• Next by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread