Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
Simon St.Laurent scripsit: > I'm not suggesting that unprefixed attributes should be treated as > global attributes. I think you're reading far too much into the little > I've actually said. I'm saying that in the context of a given element, > attributes should be treated as having the namespace context of their > containing element rather than treated as having an ambiguous namespace > context. That sounds like a distinction without a difference to me. Precisely what are you suggesting we change in the Infoset, for example? Currently, unprefixed attributes have a [namespace name] property of "no value". What would you like to see it be? -- John Cowan jcowan@r... http://www.reutershealth.com "Mr. Lane, if you ever wish anything that I can do all you will have to do will be to send me a telegram asking and it will be done." "Mr. Hearst, if you ever get a telegram from me asking you to do anything you can put the telegram down as a forgery."
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format