[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: namespace reprise

• To: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>,"Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: namespace reprise
• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 09:30:31 -0400
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E0696F80E@r...>

At 04:06 PM 8/20/2002 -0700, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
>Like I said, I haven't seen any difficulty that isn't "tempet in a
>teacup"-esque philosophical or aesthetic arguments. Where is the so
>called DIFFICULTY described in the email snippet you posted earlier.

Come now, Dare -- it's not DIFFICULT to sell crack -- but is it the most 
appropriate way to make money?

Ann

-----
Ann Navarro, WebGeek, Inc.
http://www.webgeek.com

say what? http://www.snorf.net/blog

• References:
  • RE: namespace reprise
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
• Next by Date: RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM
• Previous by thread: RE: namespace reprise
• Next by thread: RE: namespace reprise
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread