[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature o

• To: 'Dare Obasanjo' <dareo@m...>, Sam Hunting <shunting@e...>
• Subject: RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 08:31:36 -0500
• Cc: Mike Champion <mc@x...>, xml-dev@l...

That's nuts.  No sane vendor requires their production users 
to read specifications to figure out why the vendors' products 
don't work right, and no experienced manager blames the 
specifications.  They accept the responsibility to fix the 
problem.

Get this through your head:  <strong>They Blame Microsoft.</strong>  
It is YOUR problem.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Dare Obasanjo [mailto:dareo@m...]

The target audience of the infoset REC was authors of specifications and
the readers of said specs and not end users. I quote from the
introduction 

"This specification defines an abstract data set called the XML
Information Set (Infoset). Its purpose is to provide a consistent set of
definitions for use in other specifications that need to refer to the
information in a well-formed XML document [XML]. " 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: namespace reprise
• Next by Date: RE: namespace reprise
• Previous by thread: RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM
• Next by thread: RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread