• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
• From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:25:03 +0300
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B842@HQ5>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020721

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

> one 
>may want to know the document type to determine if a set of 
>rules can be created to cover issues such as the meaningfulness 
>of the containment relationships.   It seems that less and less 
>can be done without a priori knowledge of the document type.
>

True and I wouldn't want to go through mappings between the document 
structure and it's RDF counterparts for each different case. Sounds 
inconvinient and very error prone.

>Hmmm... perhaps some other forms of KR should be investigated 
>as well.
>

One will have to map any form of KR to markup anyway, unless an XML 
serialization for it already exists so I think I'll stick to what I have 
for now ;-)

Cheers,

Manos

• References:
  • RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM
• Next by Date: RE: namespace reprise
• Previous by thread: RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
• Next by thread: Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread