[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: namespace reprise

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: namespace reprise
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 22:04:21 -0400
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E0696F80E@r...>

> Like I said, I haven't seen any difficulty that isn't "tempet in a
> teacup"-esque philosophical or aesthetic arguments. Where is the so
> called DIFFICULTY described in the email snippet you posted earlier. 

The complete works of Tyler Baker are available at:
<http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Browse/ByAuthor/xml-dev?author=
tyler@i...>

One that's remarkably relevant to today's attribute discussions is:
<http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/xml-dev/655759>

Much of his 1999 collection of messages with "namespace" in the subject
line is material we've rehashed over the last year.

I'll leave it to your judgment whether Baker was merely a
philosopher-aesthete. 


-------------
Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA
http://simonstl.com may be my URI
http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI
urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether

• References:
  • RE: namespace reprise
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM
• Next by Date: RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
• Previous by thread: RE: namespace reprise
• Next by thread: RE: namespace reprise
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread