Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Like I said, I haven't seen any difficulty that isn't "tempet in a teacup"-esque philosophical or aesthetic arguments. Where is the so called DIFFICULTY described in the email snippet you posted earlier. -- PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM Putting in a request to go home early is the best way to jinx yourself and end up working overtime. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. > -----Original Message----- > From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...] > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 3:15 PM > To: xml-dev@l... > Subject: RE: namespace reprise > > > > I'd be more interested in someone who can point out the the > difficulty > > caused by namespaces in XML that don't boil down to > philosophical or > > aesthetic arguments. > > Right, right. There's no problem there, really. It's just > "philosophy" and "aesthetics" on which we've wasted the past > four years. > > The wisdom of: > * Scoped attribute declarations > * URIs as name components > * QNames in general > * attributes left out of the default namespace > > is just so obvious, that what were we thinking? (I'm sure I > left something out of that list.) > > I really hope Tyler Baker has found something better to think about. > > > ------------- > Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA > http://simonstl.com may be my URI > http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI > urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org > <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
