|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: namespace reprise
Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote, > The DNS basis asserts authority and can be construed > to assert ownership. This can have the effect of robbing > the commons by privatizing the ownership of concepts. > It will concentrate power into fewer and fewer hands > without oversight. It is a Republican's wet dream > and the ultimate third worlder's nightmare. I'm not convinced. Suppose I decided to start using "http://www.example.com/" to denote shrimp without permission form Example Inc, the rightful domain registrant. Who would come and get me? Goons from Network Solutions? On what basis? Abuse of a FQDN? Surely not: the only way to abuse a FQDN is to interfere with it's mapping to and from an IP address, not a concept. If anyone's going to come after me it'll be trademark lawyers. But how is the situation here any different from my deciding to start using "Example Inc" to denote shrimp? What's special (from a trademark lawyers POV) about a FQDN as opposed to any other string of characters? And if there isn't anything special about a FQDN, then we don't have to imagine a privatized future ... it's the status quo: names can already be owned and rights of ownership asserted. I'm not claiming this is a good thing, merely that it's (not very much) more of the same ... Cheers, Miles
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








