• To: "'W. E. Perry'" <wperry@f...>,"'XML DEV'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Markup perspective not code (was RE: Re: URIs, concrete)
• From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
• Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 17:13:24 -0600
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3D49BDFE.2C4BCF2@f...>

> Aaron Skonnard wrote:
> 
> > If this is the general sentiment, I'd suggest updating the list's
> > charter:
> >
> > "XML-DEV serves as an open, unmoderated list supporting XML
> > implementation and development. XML-DEV emphasizes active 
> > participation through code development, creation of protocols 
> > and specifications, and other material contributions such as 
> > reference resources."
> 
> Walter Perry: 
>
> Whatever for? "Code", "development", "creation", "protocols",
> "specifications", "reference" and "resources" are all wonderfully
> versatile words. Not one of them specific or limited to 
> programming (or any other narrow practice).

:-) Well, we obviously don't interpret it the same way. Such a
fundamental divide seems like reason enough to me, especially if you
expect programmers like me to respect your earlier statement about the
list.

-aaron
http://staff.develop.com/aarons

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Markup perspective not code (was RE: Re: URIs, concrete)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Markup perspective not code (was RE: Re: URIs, concrete)
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Markup perspective not code (was RE: Re: URIs, concrete)
• Next by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Previous by thread: Re: Markup perspective not code (was RE: Re: URIs, concrete)
• Next by thread: RE: Markup perspective not code (was RE: Re: URIs, concrete)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread