• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>, xml-dev@l..., humanmarkup-comment@l...
• Subject: Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
• From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 17:09:47 +0300
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B847@HQ5>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020721

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

>Understood.   But mapping may be necessary or acceptance 
>of the limits of striping.  It's a case of half-measures 
>where half-measures are adequate.   It is also a design 
>issue.  If one is designing new vocabularies rather than 
>shoe horning legacy vocabularies, designing with the SW 
>in mind from the beginning would appear to be a good idea.
>

Agreed, so let's do just that since we do have the opportunity and see 
how it goes ;-)

Manos

• References:
  • RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: namespace reprise
• Next by Date: RE: namespace reprise
• Previous by thread: RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
• Next by thread: RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread