Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Understood. But mapping may be necessary or acceptance of the limits of striping. It's a case of half-measures where half-measures are adequate. It is also a design issue. If one is designing new vocabularies rather than shoe horning legacy vocabularies, designing with the SW in mind from the beginning would appear to be a good idea. len -----Original Message----- From: Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) [mailto:mbatsis@h...] Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > one >may want to know the document type to determine if a set of >rules can be created to cover issues such as the meaningfulness >of the containment relationships. It seems that less and less >can be done without a priori knowledge of the document type. > True and I wouldn't want to go through mappings between the document structure and it's RDF counterparts for each different case. Sounds inconvinient and very error prone. >Hmmm... perhaps some other forms of KR should be investigated >as well. > One will have to map any form of KR to markup anyway, unless an XML serialization for it already exists so I think I'll stick to what I have for now ;-)
|
