• To: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>,xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Architectural Forms revival?
• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 15:33:04 -0400
• In-reply-to: <E17iK65-0001BC-00@m...>
• References: <Message from "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...><r01050300-1015-8BC65466B21911D683CE0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>

At 01:27 PM 8/23/2002 -0600, Uche Ogbuji wrote:


>  This looks like what the forthcoming HLink is supposed to do,
>but I don't like that it will be tailored to linking.  If HLink were broken
>into 2 documents: an architecture document that can be used for general XML
>remapping and a linking application of this that solves the XHTML group's
>problems, don't we have a better chance of working out of this mess?


All I can really say at this point is: please don't assume too many things 
about the proposal that will be forthcoming -- no need to work ourselves up 
over things that may or may not be.

Ann
-----
Ann Navarro, WebGeek, Inc.
http://www.webgeek.com

say what? http://www.snorf.net/blog

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Architectural Forms revival?
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• References:
  • linking, 80/20
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Architectural Forms revival?
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Architectural Forms revival?
• Next by Date: Re: linking, 80/20
• Previous by thread: Architectural Forms revival?
• Next by thread: Re: Architectural Forms revival?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread