• To: 'Uche Ogbuji' <uche.ogbuji@f...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Architectural Forms revival?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 14:33:48 -0500

Or perhaps we could call them that and honor 
those who came before.  More respect and 
less unattributed rip off would be a nice precedent, 
and seriously overdue on the web.  Otherwise, 
we are just a bunch of tomb robbers.

len

From: Uche Ogbuji [mailto:uche.ogbuji@f...]

One thing, though:  if this sort of thing happens, can we *please* not call it 
"architectural forms".  Whatever the merits of the SGML elite old guard, they 
seem to have had a great deal of trouble coming up with decent names for 
things.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Architectural Forms revival?
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • Re: Architectural Forms revival?
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: RE: XML indexing/search engine
• Next by Date: Re: Architectural Forms revival?
• Previous by thread: RE: [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer?
• Next by thread: Re: Architectural Forms revival?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread