• To: mc@x... (Mike Champion)
• Subject: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:32:39 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <J6MIQPIH73PMNMTND0PL06VPJHZWZU.3d5aaf4a@MChamp> from "Mike Champion" at Aug 14, 2002 03:28:10 PM

Mike Champion scripsit:

> May the gods have mercy on our miserable souls! XML was supposed to simplify SGML,
> now there will be a rush to SGML because it is so much simpler than XML :~)

Well, if you devised an SGML-with-default-concrete-syntax version of
the ESIS, I should think it would look pretty much like this.

-- 
There is / One art                      John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
No more / No less                       http://www.reutershealth.com
To do / All things                      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
With art- / Lessness                     -- Piet Hein

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• References:
  • Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: RE: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• Next by Date: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• Previous by thread: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• Next by thread: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread