• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:50:48 -0400
• In-reply-to: <200208141946.PAA25746@m...>

8/14/2002 3:32:39 PM, John Cowan <jcowan@r...> wrote:

>
>Well, if you devised an SGML-with-default-concrete-syntax version of
>the ESIS, I should think it would look pretty much like this.

It was the Hobson's Choice between ESIS and Groves that drove me
screaming from SGML 5 years ago. :~)

• References:
  • Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• Next by Date: Re: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• Previous by thread: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• Next by thread: RE: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread