[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)

• To: simonstl@s... (Simon St.Laurent)
• Subject: Re: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:49:15 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l..., net.dret@d... (Erik Wilde)
• In-reply-to: <r01050300-1015-1D272694AFBD11D683CE0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]> from "Simon St.Laurent" at Aug 14, 2002 03:36:22 PM

Simon St.Laurent scripsit:

> Layman normal form?  As in Andrew Layman?  This certainly isn't meant
> for the layman.

Yes.  See http://www.w3.org/TandS/QL/QL98/pp/microsoft-serializing.html .
The term "Layman normal form" was coined by Henry Thompson in his paper at
http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/normalForms.html .

> Or were you trying to make that point through blistering self-parody?
> It's not April, so it's hard to tell.  But if you wanted rejection out
> of hand followed by cackling hysterical laughter, you got it.

Hey, you've been bitching about how the PSVI can't be serialized.  I gave
you a universal serialization for *any* Infoset-like thingumabob.  Terseness
was of minimal importance.

Wuddaya want, egg in your beer?

-- 
John Cowan                              <jcowan@r...>
http://www.reutershealth.com            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
                .e'osai ko sarji la lojban.
                Please support Lojban!          http://www.lojban.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• Next by Date: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• Previous by thread: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• Next by thread: Re: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread