• To: dareo@m... (Dare Obasanjo)
• Subject: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:50:17 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: jcowan@r... (John Cowan), simonstl@s... (Simon St.Laurent), xml-dev@l..., net.dret@d... (Erik Wilde)
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E0696F7BF@r...> from "Dare Obasanjo" at Aug 14, 2002 12:46:16 PM

Dare Obasanjo scripsit:

> I thought the W3C already had a syntax for infoset serialization at
> 
>  http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml.html

No, that is a serialization syntax for the Infoset, not for "any infoset".

-- 
De plichten van een docent zijn divers,         John Cowan
die van het gehoor ook.                         jcowan@r...
      --Edsger Dijkstra                         http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

• References:
  • RE: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• Next by Date: Re: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• Previous by thread: RE: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• Next by thread: RE: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread