• To: "Murali Mani" <mani@C...>
• Subject: RE: what parsers support xml schema
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 16:39:34 -0700
• Cc: "Maciejewski, Thomas" <Thomas.Maciejewski@l...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcJQfHcAv7kuRi50T0W75eOdvBSrMQAAX1cA
• Thread-topic: what parsers support xml schema

  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Murali Mani [mailto:mani@C...] 
> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 4:25 PM
> To: Dare Obasanjo
> Cc: Maciejewski, Thomas; xml-dev@l...
> 
> 
> I am quite sure also that the subtyping of XQuery is based 
> purely on regular tree language inclusion. You can map 
> extension and restriction to one framework, and this is used 
> to do type casting etc..

You're very mistaken but since you seem to be arguing based on articles
of faith instead of facts it is a wasted effort continuing to debate
this point.  I'm out of this thread. 


-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Old cars never die, they just smell that way.     

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: what parsers support xml schema
    • From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>

• Prev by Date: RE: what parsers support xml schema
• Next by Date: Re: Byzantine schism
• Previous by thread: RE: what parsers support xml schema
• Next by thread: RE: what parsers support xml schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread