Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Byzantine schism
 If a single organization like W3C cannot be Didier, That was the focus of my "Is the W3C Losing the Plot" post. Is there a coherent W3C XML strategy? If there is no clear strategy (and I suspect there isn't one) then how can one make a sensible decision about whether a generic linking technology like XLink (or an improved XLink) makes any sense in achieving the objectives of that (non-existent? or unstated?) strategy. Without a clearer XML strategy to define the question I don't see how we can make a decision about the sense (or otherwise) of pursuing XLink over other options. Hm ... Didn't I say I was going to look at this again on Monday morning? ... You see what you did? :) Andrew Watt 
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
