Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:
> >Naah. Namespaces are designed to prevent name collisions and that's it.
> >Anything else is all in your head.
>
> That's the common refrain, and it may be true historically, but in
> practice I don't believe it. The primary use I see for namespaces is
> to quickly and easily recognize elements from particular
> vocabularies, even in the absence of local name conflicts. Resolving
> name conflicts is actually quite rare.
I agree with that at the level of element types and attribute names.
I don't agree at the level of documents, which is the level Len was
talking about (and I suspect you don't either): there is no such thing
(except by accident) as "a document in a namespace". Multi-namespaceness
is the true nature of XML documents.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan <jcowan@r...>
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
|
