• To: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Subject: Re: Is the XLink WG currently chartered or not?
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 07:40:56 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <17c.d020303.2a93655e@a...> from "AndrewWatt2000@a..." at Aug 20, 2002 05:26:54 AM

AndrewWatt2000@a... scripsit:

> Putting aside the need to update that specific Web page can anyone tell me if 
> the XLink Working Group is or is not currently chartered?

We are. All existing WGs (or at least all within the XML Activity) were renewed.

-- 
One art / There is                      John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
No less / No more                       http://www.reutershealth.com
All things / To do                      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
With sparks / Galore                     -- Douglas Hofstadter

• References:
  • Is the XLink WG currently chartered or not?
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...

• Prev by Date: Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: linking, 80/20]
• Next by Date: Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:
• Previous by thread: Re: Is the XLink WG currently chartered or not?
• Next by thread: Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread