[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:06:44 -0400
• In-reply-to: <3D5BF8ED.4DB3168@p...>

Paul writes:
> That's fine with me. But let's not pretend that the useful thing
> going on is infoset augmentation. The infoset augmentation is only
> interesting to language lawyers. The CSS-Link *syntax* is the
> relevant proposal.

Sure, though I'll admit that one of my projects with MOE is supporting
CSS both as an annotation and as an explicit CSS-in-XML syntax.  

(I'm trying to find some pathways between CSS and XSL-FO, since support
for CSS print media is poorer than suppoort for XSL-FO. Making the CSS
explicit makes it possible to use it in XSLT processing to generate
XSL-FO...)

In any case, I think this discussion's just getting started, and
hopefully it'll be interesting.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: "J. David Eisenberg" <catcode@c...>
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread