Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Paul writes: > That's fine with me. But let's not pretend that the useful thing > going on is infoset augmentation. The infoset augmentation is only > interesting to language lawyers. The CSS-Link *syntax* is the > relevant proposal. Sure, though I'll admit that one of my projects with MOE is supporting CSS both as an annotation and as an explicit CSS-in-XML syntax. (I'm trying to find some pathways between CSS and XSL-FO, since support for CSS print media is poorer than suppoort for XSL-FO. Making the CSS explicit makes it possible to use it in XSLT processing to generate XSL-FO...) In any case, I think this discussion's just getting started, and hopefully it'll be interesting. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com
|
