[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?

• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• From: "J. David Eisenberg" <catcode@c...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 14:49:32 -0500 (CDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r01050300-1015-2388B99CB08211D683CE0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>

On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Simon St.Laurent wrote:

> Paul writes:
> > That's fine with me. But let's not pretend that the useful thing
> > going on is infoset augmentation. The infoset augmentation is only
> > interesting to language lawyers. The CSS-Link *syntax* is the
> > relevant proposal.
> 
> Sure, though I'll admit that one of my projects with MOE is supporting
> CSS both as an annotation and as an explicit CSS-in-XML syntax.  
> 
> (I'm trying to find some pathways between CSS and XSL-FO, since support
> for CSS print media is poorer than suppoort for XSL-FO. Making the CSS
> explicit makes it possible to use it in XSLT processing to generate
> XSL-FO...)
> 
> In any case, I think this discussion's just getting started, and
> hopefully it'll be interesting.
> 
> 
I think this is the same kind of problem I found when I was trying to 
convert some XHTML strict to XSL-FO.  The post is at

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/XSL-FO/message/2139

(essentially, how do I map <p class="important warning">...</p> to an 
equivalent XSL-FO without parsing a stylesheet, or equally ugly, the
class attribute.) 
-- 
J. David Eisenberg  http://catcode.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
  • CSS processing (was Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by Date: CSS processing (was Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?)
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by thread: CSS processing (was Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread