• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 12:20:47 -0400
• In-reply-to: <3D5CC1DA.30608@e...>

Robin Berjon writes:
> Do we really want or need to convert those selectors to XML?

No, I don't want to convert those selectors to XML.  I just want to
create an XML representation of the decorated tree, so I can do further
processing on it (creating XSL-FO for PDF generation, actually) with
XSLT.

This should be a conveniently smaller problem, as I can start by
processing only the selectors that I feel like dealing with, and the
variety needed for print is a lot smaller.  The only tough piece seems
to be the use of 'important', and that I think I can sort out.
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• References:
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML, hypertext
• Next by Date: RE: WXS acronym?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread