• To: 'Bob DuCharme' <bobdc@s...>, "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: XML, hypertext
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 11:19:21 -0500

Time to pull out the Dexter reference model and review?

Will we end up back at Groves again?

len


From: Bob DuCharme [mailto:bobdc@s...]

Maybe a good working definition of hyper(text/link/media) is something we need to start with, if that's what we're building around. The XLink Rec (and despite my complaints about the it, I do like its definitions) defines a hyperlink as "a link that is intended primarily for presentation to a human user," which sounds pretty presentation-oriented to me!

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XML, hypertext
    • From: Jack Park <jackpark@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: WXS acronym?
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Previous by thread: Hypertext and complexity (was RE: XML, hypertext)
• Next by thread: RE: XML, hypertext
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread