• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:33:43 -0400
• In-reply-to: <r01050300-1015-CB3D4C3BB08411D683CE0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]> ("SimonSt.Laurent"'s message of "Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:25:44 -0400")
• References: <r01050300-1015-CB3D4C3BB08411D683CE0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)

/ "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> was heard to say:
|> (<rant>What happened to the
|> Last Call comments to rename the "Selectors" document[1] to "CSS3
|> Selectors". More paperwork to dig through...Sigh.</rant>)
|
| Probably a good idea, though maybe we should rename XPath to XSLT
| Selectors...

Fair enough. Or XPath Selectors, maybe, since it's used in XPointer as well.

|> Simplicity is loosing everywhere, ain't it?
|
| It already lost in XPath - what's the surprise for CSS?  I'll be happy
| so long as CSS3 stays simpler than XPath 2.0.  Or maybe that's just my
| cynicism speaking!

I sympathize. I really do.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@S...    | Convictions are more dangerous enemies of
XML Standards Architect | truth than lies.--Nietzsche
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | 

• References:
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Gah
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Previous by thread: Gah
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread