• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:19:03 -0400
• In-reply-to: <r01050300-1015-2388B99CB08211D683CE0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]> ("SimonSt.Laurent"'s message of "Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:06:44 -0400")
• References: <r01050300-1015-2388B99CB08211D683CE0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)

/ "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> was heard to say:
| Sure, though I'll admit that one of my projects with MOE is supporting
| CSS both as an annotation and as an explicit CSS-in-XML syntax.  

CSS-in-XML sounds like a good idea. Let's see, it's a bag of
properties attached to a CSS Selector. (<rant>What happened to the
Last Call comments to rename the "Selectors" document[1] to "CSS3
Selectors". More paperwork to dig through...Sigh.</rant>)

The bag of properties thing would be easy to deal with, but the set of
selectors is starting to look awfully ugly. "nth-last-child()"...Eeek!?
Simplicity is loosing everywhere, ain't it?

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@S...    | You look wise. Pray correct that
XML Standards Architect | error.--Charles Lamb
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread