• To: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: Re: A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM
• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: 21 Aug 2002 23:10:18 +0200
• Cc: Joe English <jenglish@f...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200208212113.RAA13444@m...>
• References: <200208212113.RAA13444@m...>

On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 23:00, John Cowan wrote:
> Joe English scripsit:
> 
> >     * Do not use default namespace bindings
> 
> But if only one namespace is involved, then making it the default namespace
> is not pernicious.

Except maybe if you expect people to develop XSLT transformations on
this document :-) ... 

Eric
-- 
Rendez-vous à Paris.
                          http://www.technoforum.fr/integ2002/index.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• References:
  • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM
• Next by Date: Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM
• Previous by thread: Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM
• Next by thread: Re: A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread