• To: uche.ogbuji@f... (Uche Ogbuji)
• Subject: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 20:45:22 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: amyzing@t... (Amelia A Lewis), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <E17b4cD-0008F4-00@m...> from "Uche Ogbuji" at Aug 03, 2002 01:30:45 PM

Uche Ogbuji scripsit:

> Yes we do.  For example:
> 
> http://bête.com
> 
> Is an invalid URI, and thus an invalid namespace name.  It must be escaped to
> 
> http://b%eate.com

In all probability XML Namespaces 1.1 (which is paired with XML 1.1) will
allow both of these forms as distinct namespaces.

-- 
Deshil Holles eamus.  Deshil Holles eamus.  Deshil Holles eamus.
Send us, bright one, light one, Horhorn, quickening, and wombfruit.
Send us, bright one, light one, Horhorn, quickening, and wombfruit.
Send us, bright one, light one, Horhorn, quickening, and wombfruit.
Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa!  Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa!  Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa!
  -- Joyce, _Ulysses_, "Oxen of the Sun"       jcowan@r...

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
    • From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by Date: RE: relying on ordering of sibling XML elements
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by thread: RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread