• To: "John Cowan" <jcowan@r...>,"Uche Ogbuji" <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Subject: RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
• From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>
• Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 09:35:01 +0200
• Cc: "Amelia A Lewis" <amyzing@t...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <200208050058.UAA26315@m...>

> From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@r...]
> Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 2:45 AM
> To: Uche Ogbuji
> Cc: Amelia A Lewis; xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  Re: URIs, concrete (was Re:  Un-ask the
>
>
> Uche Ogbuji scripsit:
>
> > Yes we do.  For example:
> >
> > http://bête.com
> >
> > Is an invalid URI, and thus an invalid namespace name.  It must
> be escaped to
> >
> > http://b%eate.com
>
> In all probability XML Namespaces 1.1 (which is paired with XML 1.1) will
> allow both of these forms as distinct namespaces.

How can the first be a namespace name when it's not a valid URI reference?

• References:
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: relying on ordering of sibling XML elements
• Next by Date: RE: Please no UOM (was Re: maps)
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
• Next by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread