Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the questio
 Didier PH Martin wrote: > > Didier replies: > I agree on that. To be sure that the namespace is self documented, W3C > or the XML community should enforce that a URL is to be used as a > namespace reference. This URL is pointing to a document providing > information about the namespace. This is the first step toward > transparency and inter-operability. > Excellent. I think what is needed is some way to integrate the semantics associated with a URI as provided by REST vs. that associated with RDF. Once that has been done -- it hasn't yet -- we will have a real foundation for the "Semantic Web". In the meantime it might be confusing to people that there might be _different ways_ to associate semantics with a URI. This is true. Given two methods, they _might_ disagree. So it remains up to the "owner" of the URI not to be contradictory. In any case if the owner of a URI is contradictory -- by whatever mechanism or mechanisms the contradictions arise -- we have no way to make sense of what such a URI "means". Contradictions are logically false, and unresolved contradictions in the meaning of a URI, means that the URI has no meaning. That might be true of a namespace name, or a URI used to for any other purpose. Jonathan 
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
