• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: WXS acronym?
• From: Paul Spencer <paul@a...>
• Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 20:22:05 +0100
• In-reply-to: <f5bn0rmlpgk.fsf@c...>
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020816120632.033c6d88@m...> <5.1.0.14.0.20020816120632.033c6d88@m...> <5.1.0.14.0.20020816121926.02d65dc8@n...> <f5bn0rmlpgk.fsf@c...>

On 16 Aug 2002 17:48:27 +0100, Henry Thompson wrote:

>Correct -- call the language by its full name.
>
The problem I always have is how to refer to a schema that meets the
W3C XML Schema REC. As an "XML Schema schema"? That's unbelievably
ugly! There must be a better way.

Paul Spencer

• References:
  • WXS acronym?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: WXS acronym?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: WXS acronym?
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by Date: XForms etc Terminology (Was: WXS acronym?)
• Previous by thread: Re: WXS acronym?
• Next by thread: Re: WXS acronym?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread