• To: "'Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)'" <mbatsis@h...>, xml-dev@l..., humanmarkup-comment@l...
• Subject: RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 09:28:11 -0500

Agreed.

The sign experiment DTD isn't done yet.  We are noodling 
on that one.  It may be a set of DTDs using namespaces 
for recombinators (ick... messy word that).  This one 
comes down to the architecture of the semiote and how 
it handles multiple kinds of data when selecting a 
function.  

The Primary schema draft should be available.  That one 
is being reviewed element by element.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) [mailto:mbatsis@h...]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 9:10 AM
To: Bullard, Claude L (Len); xml-dev@l...;
humanmarkup-comment@l...
Subject: Re:  RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re:
[xml-d


Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

>Understood.   But mapping may be necessary or acceptance 
>of the limits of striping.  It's a case of half-measures 
>where half-measures are adequate.   It is also a design 
>issue.  If one is designing new vocabularies rather than 
>shoe horning legacy vocabularies, designing with the SW 
>in mind from the beginning would appear to be a good idea.
>

Agreed, so let's do just that since we do have the opportunity and see 
how it goes ;-)

Manos

• Prev by Date: Re: namespace reprise
• Next by Date: Re: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
• Previous by thread: RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
• Next by thread: RE: Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: RDF Interpretation of XML documents )
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread