Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
* Bill de hÓra | | Hang on a minute. The distinction doesn't exist in RDF. I'm not | disputing it exists elsewhere. So we agree. | In no uncertain terms, the fact that an identifier used in RDF is | deferenceable is a coincidence. RDF does not have a hypertext | retrieval model a la the web; this 'feature' has been discussed to | death on the RDF lists. | | What foaf or anything else build on RDF, does with links in the | interim are their own business, more power to them I say. But when | it gets to code that infers over an RDF graph, the applications | you're talking about are working with identifiers. As far as I can tell you are saying that you agree with the premise of my posting and that you disagree with the conclusion I draw from that, but you fail to give any reasons for your disagreement. Would you mind explaining a bit more? I.e., do you have any point to make beyond agreeing with me that RDF does not make the distinction? -- Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian <URL: http://www.ontopia.net > ISO SC34/WG3, OASIS GeoLang TC <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >
|
