Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
J. David Eisenberg wrote: > Yes. I want something "generic." I can do something to the effect of: > > <xsl:template name="handle-styles"> > <xsl:if test="contains(@class, 'important')"> > <!-- add appropriate attrs to fo:block --> > </xsl:if> > <xsl:if test="contains(@class, 'warning')"> > <!-- add appropriate attrs to fo:block --> > </xsl:if> > </xsl:template> > > which will do what I intend, but if someone uses in-line > styles: > > <td style="width: 140px">tra la la</td> > > that becomes much harder to deal with. Yep. That's why I plan to normalize all CSS out to attributes on a property-by-property basis following the cascading rules. If I need to recombine them into style attributes, that won't be too hard. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com
|
