[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 17:37:26 -0400
• In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208151523060.31880-100000@t...>

J. David Eisenberg wrote:
> Yes. I want something "generic."  I can do something to the effect of:
> 
>    <xsl:template name="handle-styles"> 
>       <xsl:if test="contains(@class, 'important')">
>          <!-- add appropriate attrs to fo:block -->
>       </xsl:if>
>       <xsl:if test="contains(@class, 'warning')">
>          <!-- add appropriate attrs to fo:block -->
>       </xsl:if>
>    </xsl:template>
> 
> which will do what I intend, but if someone uses in-line
> styles:
> 
>    <td style="width: 140px">tra la la</td>
> 
> that becomes much harder to deal with.

Yep.  That's why I plan to normalize all CSS out to attributes on a
property-by-property basis following the cascading rules.  If I need to
recombine them into style attributes, that won't be too hard.
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• References:
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: "J. David Eisenberg" <catcode@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread