[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Subject: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 10:43:12 -0600
  • Cc: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>, XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
  • In-reply-to: Message from "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> of "Wed, 31 Jul 2002 18:10:55 EDT." <r01050300-1015-627F11D4A4D211D693BB0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
  • Sender: uche.ogbuji@f...

> Tim Bray writes:
> > And yes, it is obvious that an attribute can draw the bulk of its 
> > semantic import from the namespace it's in, rather than the context of 
> > the containing element.  Consider
> > 
> > <anyOldElementAtAllIDontCareWhich xml:lang="fr">Bonjour!  ...
> 
> Yes, and you've completely missed my point yet again.  I'm not arguing
> that prefixed attributes should be in the namespace of the element
> containing them.  I'm arguing that _unprefixed_ attributes should be
> treated as if they had the same namespace as the element containing
> them.

Ah.  So Simon and I *are* arguing just the same thing.  Cool.  We're beginning 
to be a cabal, Simon.  :-)


> > There's a technical term for Simon's argument in this case: "wrong".

Is there a technical argument to back this up?


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                                    Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net    http://4Suite.org    http://fourthought.com
Track chair, XML/Web Services One Boston: http://www.xmlconference.com/
Basic XML and RDF techniques for knowledge management, Part 7 - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-think12.html
Keeping pace with James Clark - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-jclark.html
Python and XML development using 4Suite, Part 3: 4RDF - http://www-105.ibm.com/developerworks/education.nsf/xml-onlinecourse-bytitle/8A1EA5A2CF4621C386256BBB006F4CEC



Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member