• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: patterns vs. identifiers
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 02:20:32 +1000
• References: <r01050300-1015-44EA06C4B43F11D69F470003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]> <200208201429.35571.miles@m...>

From: "Miles Sabin" <miles@m...>

> I'm obviously missing something, because of the ten design goals listed 
> at the the top of the XML REC only one, "XML documents should be 
> human-legible and reasonably clear", speaks to humanity. The bulk of 
> the remainder address automated processing and the needs of 
> programmers.

Surely a single simple statement like that is enough?  I don't think you
can weigh thase goals as if they are the results of a competition where
machines win 9:1 over humans.  

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: patterns vs. identifiers
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>

• References:
  • Re: patterns vs. identifiers
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: patterns vs. identifiers
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespace declaration versus attribute
• Next by Date: Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
• Previous by thread: Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: patterns vs. identifiers)
• Next by thread: Re: patterns vs. identifiers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread