• To: Michael Leditschke <mike@a...>
• Subject: Re: WXS acronym?
• From: Eddie Robertsson <erobertsson@a...>
• Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 10:29:10 +1000
• Cc: donpark@d..., xml-dev@l...
• References: <LOBBICBLDJIJHPNJFPOLGEDNCLAA.mike@a...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530

>
>
>>c) Most importantly, XSD is what people are using as file extension
>>currently, so switching over to WXS at this point will only promote
>>confusion.
>>
>>XSD is XSD and that is that.
>>    
>>
>
>I started using XSD because that is the namespace prefix used in 
>the W3C XML Schema primer. Namespace prefixes are a place
>where you need a logical abbreviation, and this one was 
>provided courtesy of the W3C.
>
But the examples in the Structures spec [1], the "Schema for Datatype 
Definitions (normative)" [2] and the "Schema for Schemas (normative)" 
[3] uses the prefix "xs"...

Cheers,
/Eddie

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#schema
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#normative-schemaSchema

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: WXS acronym?
    • From: "Michael Leditschke" <mike@a...>

• References:
  • RE: WXS acronym?
    • From: "Michael Leditschke" <mike@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: linking, 80/20
• Next by Date: Re: Acronym spaces, namespaces,and authority (was Re:
• Previous by thread: RE: WXS acronym?
• Next by thread: RE: WXS acronym?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread