[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Comparable considered necessary

• To: clbullar@i... ("Bullard, Claude L (Len)")
• Subject: Re: Comparable considered necessary
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:40:12 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: jcowan@r... ('John Cowan'), prb@f..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B7B8@HQ5> from "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" at Aug 12, 2002 08:56:44 AM

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit:
> 
> There is a name of a cat to ask inside.  The name is 
> meaningless but it is used by lots of servers and that 
> makes it moreorless a reliable way to get the cat's 
> attention.

No, no.  Inside a *namespace* name is a name of the source of authority
for that name.

-- 
John Cowan        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan          jcowan@r...
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan

• References:
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
• Next by Date: RE: Comparable considered necessary
• Previous by thread: RE: Comparable considered necessary
• Next by thread: RE: Comparable considered necessary
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread