• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
• From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 07:46:12 +0000
• In-reply-to: <3D6E64A9.E1C44AD0@p...>
• References: <001d01c24f83$e2926430$0600a8c0@gandalf> <3D6E64A9.E1C44AD0@p...>

Paul Prescod <paul@p...> wrote:

| As the idea gains currency we could push towards a new version of the
| namespaces spec that encourages (and perhaps one day requires) sanity
| everywhere.

Pour good money after bad?  Ah so, economics.

• References:
  • RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
  • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Why is there no schema for RSS?
• Next by Date: RE: XML indexing/search engine
• Previous by thread: Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
• Next by thread: Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread