Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
From what I've seen the most popular RSS formats are RSS 0.91 and RSS 1.0. I found an RSS 0.91 schema[0] online but am tempted to write my own anyway since the use of substitution groups seems like overkill at first glance to me. Of course I may be wrong. Thanks for the pointer to Leigh's RSS 1.0 schema. I'll see if it meets my needs although I'd probably prefer a W3C XML Schema schema (ah, the redundancy) with embedded schematron for the places XSD cannot handle. This is looking to be a fun weekend. :) [0] http://xmlmodeling.com/examples/book/Chapter9/rss-0.91.xsd -- PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM Old cars never die, they just smell that way. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe English [mailto:jenglish@f...] > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 7:40 PM > To: xml-dev@l... > > > > RSS 0.92 was developed by Dave Winer, who is of the "here's > what a sample document looks like" school of formal specifications :-) > > Regarding the RDF schema for RSS 1.0, as far as I know -- > please correct me if I'm wrong -- an RDF schema doesn't > actually imply any notion of "validity"; it just makes > statements like "resources of class X may have properties of > type Y with a domain of type Z". (And since any such > statement is true already, regardless of whether or not it is > asserted by an RDF schema, I suspect that RDFS is meant to be > informative rather than > prescriptive.) > > Leigh Dodds wrote a Schematron schema for RSS 1.0 though: > > < http://www.ldodds.com/rss_validator/1.0/ > >
|
