[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming

• To: 'John Cowan' <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: RE: Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 16:40:37 -0500
• Cc: simonstl@s..., xml-dev@l...

Nah, that is too far down.  It is a markup system.

I hate to say it, but it is a well-formed only core.
So we'd have to rip out DTDs and some other stuff.

Dang... now I do have a bad taste in my mouth just 
I was taking medicine that I needed but was ick.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@r...]

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit:

> The core should be the absolute smallest set of features 
> that guarantee global interoperability.

That would be plain text.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: Markup pe rspective not code)
• Next by Date: RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Previous by thread: RE: Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming
• Next by thread: RE: Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread