• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Default namespaces are *evil*! (RE: Global/Local attributes)
• From: Kian-Tat Lim <ktl@k...>
• Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 12:39:57 -0700
• References: <005401c23a5a$9df0d930$0200a8c0@skonnardomni>
• Reply-to: ktl@k...

Aaron Skonnard wrote:
> I don't see the problem with [having two kinds of names];
> it's up to the application to deal with.

But if different specifications for applications define
different ways of dealing with names in no namespace,
wouldn't we have a recipe for the rampant confusion that
has been demonstrated here and eventual interoperability failure?

-- 
Kian-Tat Lim, ktl@k..., UTF-7: +Z5de+pBU-

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Default namespaces are *evil*! (RE: Global/Local attributes)
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>

• References:
  • RE: Default namespaces are *evil*! (RE: Global/Local attributes)
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by Date: Re: Global/Local attributes
• Previous by thread: RE: Default namespaces are *evil*! (RE: Global/Local attributes)
• Next by thread: RE: Default namespaces are *evil*! (RE: Global/Local attributes)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread