• To: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Subject: Re: Global/Local attributes
• From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 13:47:49 -0600
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: Message from Richard Tobin <richard@c...> of "Fri, 02 Aug 2002 13:25:13 BST." <200208021225.NAA24008@m...>
• Sender: uche.ogbuji@f...

> The "obviously stupid" example
> 
>   <x:foo x:att="one" att="two"/>
> 
> does not use the default namespace in any way, and would be equally
> legal and stupid if the default namespace didn't exist.

Quite right.  I also get the feeling we're mixing two entirely independent 
concerns.

But such is the way of threads, I guess.

-- 
Uche Ogbuji                                    Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net    http://4Suite.org    http://fourthought.com
Track chair, XML/Web Services One Boston: http://www.xmlconference.com/
Basic XML and RDF techniques for knowledge management, Part 7 - 
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-think12.html
Keeping pace with James Clark - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/libra
ry/x-jclark.html
Python and XML development using 4Suite, Part 3: 4RDF - 
http://www-105.ibm.com/developerworks/education.nsf/xml-onlinecourse-bytitle/8A
1EA5A2CF4621C386256BBB006F4CEC

• References:
  • Re: Global/Local attributes
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Default namespaces are *evil*! (RE: Global/Local attributes)
• Next by Date: Re: Default namespaces are *evil*! (RE: Global/Local
• Previous by thread: Re: Global/Local attributes
• Next by thread: Re: Global/Local attributes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread