[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
John Cowan wrote: > Ah. Then you would forbid a basically no-namespace document that has > a few xlink:* attributes? In the interests of consistency and understandability, I think it's a small price to pay to insist on an additional "xmlns='something'" attribute when various "xlink:*" attributes and "xmlns:xlink" attributes are already being added. -- Kian-Tat Lim, ktl@k..., UTF-7: +Z5de+pBU-
|

Cart



