[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


John Cowan wrote:
> Ah.  Then you would forbid a basically no-namespace document that has
> a few xlink:* attributes?

In the interests of consistency and understandability, I think it's
a small price to pay to insist on an additional "xmlns='something'"
attribute when various "xlink:*" attributes and "xmlns:xlink"
attributes are already being added.

-- 
Kian-Tat Lim, ktl@k..., UTF-7: +Z5de+pBU-

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member